By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The Console Race: Did Sony Diet Too Early?

nightsurge I think simply they WERE desperate, PS3 sales weren't great, the had pressure from 3rd parties & the press earlier in the year was counting PS3 out.

This was their chance.....they took

if they had done this say next year, who knows? the 360 lead could have been at 10 million by then.



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Around the Network
nen-suer said:
I think it was perfect timing

But maybe there will be a slimmer PS3 design down the line

The current Slim PS3 still has a fan right?  Sony's slim line usually doesnt consist of a fan making it even smaller, so im sure a slimmer PS3 without a fan could quite possibly happen =)



V-r0cK said:
nen-suer said:
I think it was perfect timing

But maybe there will be a slimmer PS3 design down the line

The current Slim PS3 still has a fan right?  Sony's slim line usually doesnt consist of a fan making it even smaller, so im sure a slimmer PS3 without a fan could quite possibly happen =)

But is that even possible to cool advanced chips like the RSX and Cell or any modern computer/console chip without a fan somewhere moving air?



Your forgetting the estimated cost of Natal dude.

Kotaku is throwing out numbers starting at 150$. PSmote will certainly be cheaper, even if its just for one.



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

megaman79 said:
Your forgetting the estimated cost of Natal dude.

Kotaku is throwing out numbers starting at 150$. PSmote will certainly be cheaper, even if its just for one.

$150 for Natal versus what, exactly?  If a "PSmote" is similar in pricing to a Wiimote which it should be, that's $40 each.  So you have PS Eye = $40 + 2 wands = $120 just for 2 people.  Then if you want all 4, its $200 minimum.

We have no idea what Natal or the wands will cost, but in the end I think they'll be about the same price to get the equal experience with Natal maybe a bit cheaper (up to 4 players local).



Around the Network
nightsurge said:
V-r0cK said:
nen-suer said:
I think it was perfect timing

But maybe there will be a slimmer PS3 design down the line

The current Slim PS3 still has a fan right?  Sony's slim line usually doesnt consist of a fan making it even smaller, so im sure a slimmer PS3 without a fan could quite possibly happen =)

But is that even possible to cool advanced chips like the RSX and Cell or any modern computer/console chip without a fan somewhere moving air?

lol who knows XD... i'd love to properly answer this question but im not that techy enough to know the cooling requirement differences between like the PS2's chip and the PS3. 

If somebody could answer nightsurge's question that would be much appreciated =)



I'm suspecting this is why Microsoft has been awfully quiet regarding what they intend to do to go back in the weekly sales lead. I highly doubt that Sony would be able to afford to drop the PS3 cheaper than 299$, whereas Microsoft "might" be willing to reduce the Arcade unit to 169.99, in which case there would be mayhem and pandemonium (not the game, unfortunately). If they timed it right, i.e. right before the holidays, it might spur on a massive increase in sales that would help them regain the original lead. It also depends on what kind of bundles/ what they have to entice the European/American population.

As of right now though, they can't be happy with what's been going on in Japan. While I'm sure 1.15 million ( I think that was the last sales number) is a vast improvement over the original xbox, it's still a paltry sum compared to what the PS3 has been raking in over there.



nightsurge said:
Scoobes said:
I don't think looking at time spans of the previous PS slim releases is the best way to analyse the position of the PS3 slim as this time it came about out of neccessity rather than elongation of product life-span. I wouldn't put it past Sony to have plans already in place to elongate the lifespan of PS3 as a product. They keep touting this 10yr plan so it wouldn't suprise me if they have at least some secret plans ready for execution.

Also, whilst Natal may be getting all the attention, Sony's dildo... ahem... "Wand" will also be releasing, and probably for cheaper than Natal (Natal looks to incoporate more complicated tech than the Wand). I also don't see MS releasing a revised slim version of 360. Partly because their strength isn't in hardware, but software and also because they'd need to design the it around some of the periphals (mainly the HDD).

I briefly mentioned the Natal/Sony Wand tech into it, but didn't expand as I didn't want to make this a giant wall of text.

In my view, Natal and Sony's Motion will likely in the end cost the same, or possibly have the Sony Motion being more expensive.  It all depends on Wand pricing and whether you will need more wands to have the full experience.  If for instance you need 8 wands for 4 person games, that could increase costs quite a bit, where as Natal is and all in one purchase that automatically supports up to 4 players.

As far as the slim/revision to the 360, I feel they would likely focus on making it shorter (vertical stand position).  They could shrink the motherboard quite a bit, especially if they merge the chips in the Valhalla revision.  Then all they need to do is for once make a decent cooling system which would be much smaller and cheaper thanks to chip reductions.  This way so long as they keep the actual width the same it always supports all hard drives.  They could also just redesign it in a way that the HDD fits on top or sides or something, but the way I described would be the easiest for cutting costs and maintaining backwards compatibility with peripherals.

@Smashed:  I was not saying this at all.  In fact I said I expect it to repeat it's 2007/2008 performance to even a higher degree.  I am just saying thinking long term past 2010, have Sony lost one of their biggest moves?

That's a good point on the costs, but I think out of the box the wand thing will cost less than Natal, with the tech and R&D costs for Natal being significantly higher than the Wand as far as I can tell. Also MS definately has a huge 1up on the marketing side so it'll be interesting to see how it pans out.

I still very much doubt MS doing a hardware revision, they just don't seem to be able to design stable hardware, but with the success Sony's had I suppose its a possibility. As long as they don't screw up on design again and cool it properly as opposed to lazy and passive cooling. Seriously, I think half the PC gamer's on this site could have designed a more stable console.



Ultimately, both Slim designs were meant to expand the userbase from the core to mainstream gamers, but under different circumstances.

When they originally launched, the PS2 and PS3 had the appearance of "bad add tech"; the sleek design, the metallic case, and all the hype making them out to be the latest and greatest, gave the PS2 and PS3 a very "unconsole" like appearance. While this made the "computer entertainment system" more approachable to the hardcore, there are many for whom "bad ass tech" is actually a turn off, namely the more mainstream/casual gamers. Making a Slim version of the consoles, making them smaller and using plastic instead of metal, changes the appearance from "bad ass" to "toy", and makes it more approachable to the non-hardcore. Meanwhile, the hardcore don't care that much, it's the games that really define the console, the hardcore games were already there, and they already have their "bad ass" version; so who cares if a more "toyetic" version appears.

The real difference is the circumstances surrounding the Slim upgrades. When the PS2 Slim came out, the original had the hardcore/core market locked up, so the only place for growth was into the mainstream/casual space. When the PS3 Slim appeared, the old PS3 was in tough competition with the Xbox 360, giving them little room to maneuver in the hardcore space, and the Wii leapfrogged them right both in the race to the masses, so Sony had to give chase before Nintendo had them on lock down.



Veder Juda is hand crafted from EPIC FAIL, and is a 96% certified Looney; the other 4% is a work in progress.

I would say the slim model came 3 years too late.

Sony doesn't have much choices but to drop the price and drop the cost of the console in order to stay competetive. The sooner the better for them.
Of course, a redesign doesn't end cost cutting and while a new redesign is not likely to come out, the cost will still be cut several times before this gen ends.

The previous redesigns have also been made in need, not maybe in similar need as the PS3, but at least to boost the sales and fix hardware issues.

Yes it's eventually possible to cool it without a fan, although we likely don't see the fan getting dropped out, due to the need for very expensive heatsink and i don't think it's yet possible to do with the tech today anyway.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.