Well that's lame.
theprof00 said: or make the game into a 40$ game and a 60$ collectors edition |
Good point!
MAFKKA said: Im not bashing the install per se, im not bashing the 360, im not bashing MS, im not bashing fans, im not bashing people with an arcade. I am pointing fingers and asking questions of how Turn 10 can make a choice of excluding gamers when developing exclusivly for a console. And if you're defending their choice, its either because your not the one stuck with an Arcade and want to play F3, or you just chose to go selective perception and try to make this into Sony vs MS, when nothing i've said have brought up console wars, sony or MS. You're the ones trolling imo. |
Your first two posts in this thread were and I quote:
In one breath i can see them just releasing the first disc, no second disc no one would say a thing.
On th eother hand, to use the second disc in their numbers soap box, and track numbers... IE: to brag about total numbers when some of them wont be playable to all users is lame.
This is the bad side of DVD in moving forward with tech. No other way around it. Its not a deal breaker or anything, but in this day and age with the tech we have, with Natal coming soon, theres no excuse for something to be taking place that needed to be done back in 1997.
JaggedSac said: Lets take a look at the 2 options that they had: 1 - Only have 1 disc and no one will get extra content on a second disc. 2 - Have two discs so that at least some people can enjoy some more stuff. Everyone still has the same experience as number 1, except now there is the option for more. Win, Win, Win. |
Very well said. This is something that should be obvious to EVERYBODY, but it is something that is very conveniant for the fanboys to "forget" about.
ironman said:
Very well said. This is something that should be obvious to EVERYBODY, but it is something that is very conveniant for the fanboys to "forget" about. |
Oh Everybody does see this, what you fail to see however is how wrong that statement is. This is why everyone was complaining about the lack of HDD in the arcade to begin with. To release a game with two discs costing $60 that only some people will be able to play 100% is just not right. It would be no different than M$ deciding to release games on HD-DVD and saying "Well, you get everything on one disc and less compression, for those that have one already its great but those that dont can just buy the add-on." Complete BS.
ironman said:
Very well said. This is something that should be obvious to EVERYBODY, but it is something that is very conveniant for the fanboys to "forget" about. |
Oh Everybody does see this, what you fail to see however is how wrong that statement is. This is why everyone was complaining about the lack of HDD in the arcade to begin with. To release a game with two discs costing $60 that only some people will be able to play 100% is just not right. It would be no different than M$ deciding to release games on HD-DVD and saying "Well, you get everything on one disc and less compression, for those that have one already its great but those that dont can just buy the add-on." Complete BS.
darendt said:
Oh Everybody does see this, what you fail to see however is how wrong that statement is. This is why everyone was complaining about the lack of HDD in the arcade to begin with. To release a game with two discs costing $60 that only some people will be able to play 100% is just not right. It would be no different than M$ deciding to release games on HD-DVD and saying "Well, you get everything on one disc and less compression, for those that have one already its great but those that dont can just buy the add-on." Complete BS. |
Would you stop perpetuating lies. The first post points out that Arcade users can pick and choose components to copy onto their memory card. Just because they can't have 100% all at once doesn't mean they don't have 100% available to them at all. At the end of the day, you can only drive one car at a time on one track at a time.
Never argue with idiots
They bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience
darendt said:
Oh Everybody does see this, what you fail to see however is how wrong that statement is. This is why everyone was complaining about the lack of HDD in the arcade to begin with. To release a game with two discs costing $60 that only some people will be able to play 100% is just not right. It would be no different than M$ deciding to release games on HD-DVD and saying "Well, you get everything on one disc and less compression, for those that have one already its great but those that dont can just buy the add-on." Complete BS. |
Nice double post, but Iask you, what would have been a better option on the 360, Not include the content on the second disc? Then would it be a better deal at $60.00. I mean honestly, What would it take to make you happy?
If a person bought the arcade, they did so KNOWING that it didn't come with a hard drive. The only people I have EVER seen complaining about the lack of a hard drive, are Sony fanboys who don't even have a 360. Also, anybody with an arcade model, has the option to upgrade so they can play the full second disc, You can buy a used 20GB HD for around $20.00, as an added bonus, you now have room to store other content as well. If people REALLY want to play the second disc, and they can't get what they want on their memory card, or internal memeory, they have the option to buy 20 gigs of memory for less than HALF the cost of a memory card. That to me, is better than NOT having the extra cars or tracks.