Tyrannical said:
Onyxmeth said:
It's not all that black and white. My own moral standards say to lock his ass up. However, the case he got convicted in was kinda a sham, the judge that convicted him turned out to be an anti-semite, and the laws back in the 1970's were not as harsh as they are now. In California back when this happened, no one had been locked up for the charges he faced in over two years. He was getting special treatment in this case, but not in a good way.
I think the only fair thing is to retry the case and see what happens.
|
He got a 13 year old girl drunk and drugged her with qualudes, then raped her. Not stautatory rape either, but girl was unwilling rape.
I'm sure the judge was an anti-semite, because he threw out the ridiculous plea bargain that he'd only have to serve the roughly forty days in jail he already served.
|
He got accused of those things, but not convicted. I know the difference between what kind of vigilante justice I would love to happen to him, and what the law has presented. Unfortunately they don't match up. Regardless of the sick bastard he is, he still deserves the same fair trial everyone is legally supposed to have. When he recently tried to get the case dismissed, the evidence he provided to a new judge was substantial enough that the judge acknowledged there was severe misconduct during the trial. It may have gotten thrown out altogether, but Polanski was ordered to appear for the dismissal hearings in America, and he wouldn't risk it coming back.
The anti-semite comments against the judge stemmed from some group the judge was a member of that didn't allow jews to join. As far as I remember, it wasn't religious based where that might have been a problem.