err ign said 9.5 but look at this one "Not enough puzzles", psst

Bias.

Oh I'm sorry. People who are in the beta, which is nearly everyone in this thread unless there 360 fanboys like yourself. How about we ask everyone whos played the beta if they think its better than killzone 2. I think I know what the answer would be. I can say these things seece because I've played both games and I've talked to quite a few people who agree Uncharted 2 is the best PS3 game yet.

I still don't know why 360 fanboys insist on sticking there noses into the PS3 section to drop there biased opinions and flame bait. Do you know what I should do, head over to the 360 section, find the Halo ODST thread, tell people how crap the game is and that it deserves a 5/10 without even playing the game or planning on playing the game. Or try and be smart to people in that thread in the fashion of how you do it over here. I've been seeing a lot of your thread Seece. All you do is troll

So negative, first off I suggest you learn the rules of this forum because calling someone a fanboy won't be tolerated.

Your head is in the clouds, do you even read half the posts I make, like er the one above the post I just posted?

In no way shape or form did I say Uncharted 2 was crap, I fully expect it to be great and I bloody hope so because I'll be buying it next year.

Adjust your attitude it stinks.

lol, if you put like that then :

7/10 = very good

6/10 = good

5/10 = decent

4/10 = mediocre

3/10 = not bad

2/10 = bad

1/10 = terrible

so anything above 5 is all good

Well to be fair IGN said there were less puzzles but bigger in scale and more challenging than the first game.

I thought it has been established that Uncharted 2 has virtually no loading time? Anyways, this review is fishy, I do not give it much credibility. Maybe they played the beta and gave the game a full review based on that. Anyways, the SP is longer, it has multiplayer...yet according to them it has less replay value than the fist? Fail.

oh please everyone a xboy fanboy wrote this review, don't believe it, the sound is brilliaint and the durabilty is better than what he said because of the multiplayer, it's just a fanboy's attempt to pull down it's overall score

Co-op was disappointing? Sorry, were they playing the same game as me?

Calm down people. Gamereactor Sweden gave the last game 9 and it is not the same reviewer. If you look at the second opinion that one is the same reviewer as last time and he gave the game 10/10. Mikael Sundberg is the one to be trusted on this and not Petter Hegevall.