Although the PS3 is getting pretty close the 360 in 90 average games on metacritic, what was amazing was the amount of games just below that 90. Yes, 12 games are currently sitting at 89, which is amazing and tells me how amazing the 360 library is this gEN. Altough i spend a lot of time defending the PS3, I have to give prop to MS on getting so many good games.

Disscuus folks. Keep it nice.

Here are the 12 games.

Call of Duty 2

Rez HD

Castlevania: Symphony of the Night

Left 4 Dead

Fable II

Burnout Paradise: The Ultimate Box

Burnout Revenge

The Beatles: Rock Band

Dead Space

Peggle

Virtua Fighter 5

Shadow Complex

More facts: The 360 has 165 games with an 80 score and above, which tells me it has enough games for everyone to play.

who cares about scores again?

I knew you were a double Agent!!

Sorry i always wanted to say that to you because your made of so much win. ^_^

Anyways OT... yes MS got the early bird start with a bang indeed, its great that Sony is still trying and doing well but i feel they both have an equal amount of great games to call there own.

As far as Meta goes, i don't use it at all since they count evey little site most of the time therefore messing everthing up as a final result.

In the end it doesn't even matter... great games are what they are, and the rivalery will just bring us more AAA games to come.

In conclusion, gaming has never been at its finest... until now.

nobady it seems, unless Eurogamer gives 7, then it's imortant again.

that's very nice of you recognizing the xbox libraries. +100pts respect pts for you dude.

i never cared about scores. i just try the games and judge myself. i also like to hear friend's with simillar taste's (believe me those never exist ever) opinion.
i think Cross Edge didn't deserve that much low score (it was bad but not that much). and Assassins creed deserves alot lower score, also GTA.

Interesting. I still think the PS3 has the better games, though (just my opinion).

I think both have done well regarding game quality - although neither being mass market enough to attract too much shovelware, and both being expensive to develop for is probably a big factor.

Of course, with 360 being on market longer it should have more games with higher scores or in fact you could argue the quality of library was much worse than PS3.

By the same token I'm sure (can't be bothered checking) that the 360 probably has more games with lower scores for the same reason.

Out of curiosity, what are the 12 games?

This was a bueatiful post, brought a tear to my eye. Everyone at work is staring at me.