@ NKAJ
its like saying to the Xbox and PS fanboys wii graphics are better.

the ps3 is capable of far better graphics, look at all sony first party games, on 3rd party games developers are scared to make one game better then the other, they want them to be the same. the only games that looked better on 360 are 2006-2007 360 ports to ps3, thats it. i own both systems, like both, but love my ps3. everybody will see the difference in uncharted2, god of war3, mag, heavy rain, just to name a few, i dont have a problem with 360 graphics, the ps3 are just better, and its capable of more, it is what it is.

You seem to really believe this, yet multi-plat developers say otherwise.  Guess who I'm going to believe.

Yeah my thoughts too. 

@Mazty

1.  There isn't just a "little" between the two GPU's it's quite a gulf, hence why the PS3 has to use a blur to achieve AA.

2.  The PS3 needs the permanent HDD for texture loading as the bluray drives don't read as fast as DVD so without it you would get texture pop in.  This isn't an advantage, it was a necessary requirement.

3.  The Cell does suck for rendering, it's not a GPU despite what most bullshitters will tell you.  Every resource spent bolstering graphics takes away from other elements which is probably why we've not seen the advantage of the Cell's extra horsepower elsewhere in games.

"Texture installation"

Never heard of that one before...

Look at this after 1:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhDghvsY7SU 

or this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA0kiV8ZnLE 

It's not hard rendering lots of enemies on screen when the AI is stupid...

Info about the amount of polygons in FORZA3 (wikipedia):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forza_Motorsport_3

"The new graphics engine features ten times more polygons in each car model, bump mapping, and texture resolutions four times higher than before. Also, it is confirmed that the game will run at 60 frames per second."

10 Times more than FORZA2, some cars can have 1.000.000 polygons!

I still haven't seen the game on 360 that is better looking than Killzone 2 or Uncharted 2

And since when does two games, which is 0.36% of the total amount of games on the PS3 and 0.51% of its exclusives, determine that that system is more powerful than the X360? You people should reallystop being so biased and stop acting like it's the rule. Those two games are the exception. And besides that, there are too many factors to take into account, like art style, team size, time, engine optimization, and the OPINION of the person. Arguably the latest games on the PS2 looked better than the old Xbox. Does that mean the PS2 is more powerful because it has a few games that do? NO. And even then, it's still in the eye of the beholder and.. I'm going to say this again..

SOMETHING THAT IS BETTER LOOKING TO THE EYE DOES NOT MEAN THAT THAT SYSTEM IS USING MORE POWER. THAT CONCLUSION IS SIMPLY FALSE AND  NOT LOGICAL

Yes probably 8 out of the 10 best looking console titles are on the ps3, Part of the problem is a lot of the ps3's games are exclusive, thus the developers can push the console to the limits further. This doesnt seem to happen on the xbox360 side of the things, the best looking games are crossplatform engine based eg Unreal 3 engine or like alan wake which is also coming to the PC. MS should invest $30million or so in a xbox360 exclusive (no PC port) that pushes the machine to its limits, just so it can score some bragging rights