Entroper said:
If we were looking at another Gamecube, Nintendo would be making money. They made quite a bit of money on the `cube, you know. I think the reason some people are upset is that Nintendo refuses to attempt the loss-leader hardware strategy that Sony and MS have. Wii hardware is sold at a profit, not a loss, so those who want HD graphics and a hard drive feel that Nintendo could have incorporated these features into the Wii and sold it at a loss. The trouble is, to really compete with the 360 and PS3 in terms of graphics, the cost would be raised too much, and they'd be playing the same game as Sony and MS. The industry does not have room for three loss-leaders. Nintendo hasn't "set us back" a generation, they just realized where the other two were headed, and chose to take a fork in the road instead. |
You know what amazes me? The people who believe Nintendo is being greedy by selling for a profit. It's as if gamers believe they deserve to have giant, multi-media coporations bleed billions of dollars just to please them.
Or put less sarcastically, "losing billions of dollars" has become the fiscal status quo in the games industry. Any attempt to actually stop such hemorrhaging -- be it selling your console for a profit, or something like micro-transcactions -- is instantly loathed and scorned.
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">











