Not better than Cod4 & MW2, but good enough for a game with this scale.
@Skeeuk
Don't forget that CoD4 runs at 60fps and 2xAA. If they would drop that, then they could implement a lot more players on one map.
Not better than Cod4 & MW2, but good enough for a game with this scale.
@Skeeuk
Don't forget that CoD4 runs at 60fps and 2xAA. If they would drop that, then they could implement a lot more players on one map.
PDF said:
frag fx. it will change your life |
Nunchucks + mous controllers, and frag fx... what are you talking about?
| The_God_of_War said: It does look better than COD 4 (2 and a half years old by the time MAG releases). It is impressive for a 256-player game though. |
really?
PDF said:
This |
How much are those?

Wow @ the people ripping on this game.
What other 256 player game do you know of that looks this good?
Good graphics indeed,almost all next gen games have good graphics.
Better than MW2? Of course, MW2 isnt about graphics,its about gameplay.
Will Mag be running at 60fps locked?
Will MAG even touch CoDMW2 online? Nope.
Will Mag better just as good as CoD mw2? Yup if not better.
PDF said:
This |
I was thinking this instead of FragFX - This is wireless and is called FRAGnStein!
deathgod33 said:
really? |
Just judging from that Youtube video I'd say it's at least on par with COD 4. COD 4 never really looked that amazing though, if you ask me.

Skeeuk said:
can you just imagine cod4 and mw2 with that large field and player count, it would look like an n64 game. |
i lol'd
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.


