Sky Render said: Why does this surprise people, anyway? I mean, one of the most prominent names in shovelware on the NES was Square. The company was so notorious for poorly made games that they almost shut their doors in the late 80s and named what was to be their last game in recognition of this fact: Final Fantasy.
I'd be far more worried about the companies today that are NOT changing, to be honest. What's more disconcerting: a company noted for bad games putting out a good game, or a company noted for good games releasing what amounts to variations of the same game over and over again?
|
It should be obvious that anybody who invests in some shoddy games and makes a tidy profit will turn around and invest that larger sack of money in new, bigger projects. And while the pockets get deeper, the programmers and designers will naturally become more experienced, leading to better and better products.
But it's still cool to see it in action like this. Especially when so many people take the attitude that a developer/publisher is either top-tier or a waste of everybody's time.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.