Lol at the Bully comparison, its a PS2 engine port.. on the 360 and wii

| psrock said: The question is kind of insulting, but I blame Nintendo for allowing people to question the graphic of its system to one that came out in 2000. |
Don't blame Nintendo for what 3rd parties have done with the graphics of their console.
With the exception of the simple look of the Wii series and Animal Crossing, the majority of all Nintendo's Wii games have set the graphical standards for the console.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
Khuutra said:
So you're saying that, instead of graphical power, you're going by art direction and style? Because I can name a lot that look better than God of War in that sense. WiiWare is rich inndeed. |
I never said art direction and style, i just dont think cartoony styled games look as good as more realistic efforts.
But if this is an art direction and style war, Shadow of the Collosus ends this arguement.
![]()
Am I the only person who doesn't find Shadow of Collosus' and ICO's art styles over the top amazing anymore? Yeah at the time they were great, but we've seen better with Vanillaware's Odin sphere and Muramasa, and Capcom/Clover's Okami. There are quite a few other games too. Overall the game is a masterpiece, but art-wise they don't stand up anymore.
Carl2291 said:
I never said art direction and style, i just dont think cartoony styled games look as good as more realistic efforts. But if this is an art direction and style war, Shadow of the Collosus ends this arguement. |
Look
When you say realistic style is better than cartoony style
That is definitely saying something about art direction and style.
sc94597 said:
That is far from the truth. Most XBOX games dont look better than God of War 2, it is the Higher Quality ones that do look better. Even if it were the case how is that sad? It isn't the console that makes it sad, but the developers. The Wii is more powerful than the Xbox, and if developers can't use the power like they should it isn't the Wii that makes it sad. |
Nintendo made the decision to make the Wii what it is today, not the developers. They work with what they have, but just like early PS2 games looked bad, Wii games will get better each year, but it will still be limited.
Next Gen
| 11/20/09 04:25 | makingmusic476 | Warning | Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.) |
Khuutra said:
Look When you say realistic style is better than cartoony style That is definitely saying something about art direction and style. |
I see your point.
Now stop arguing with me, im tired and starting to not make sense 
It seems a lot of people think so far Wii > PS2, it also seems a lot of people think so far PS2 > Wii.
![]()
psrock said:
Nintendo made the decision to make the Wii what it is today, not the developers. They work with what they have, but just like early PS2 games looked bad, Wii games will get better each year, but it will still be limited.
|
That has nothing to do with your post. You posted that the ALL Xbox games look better than PS2 games. The Wii is more powerful than the Xbox, therefore it is possible for ALL Wii games to surpass every PS2 game. Does that happen? No. Why? Very few developers other than Nintendo care to push it. So that means it is the developers fault, not the fault of Nintendo. If developers can't push the power that is there right now, why would they need more power?