| ClaudeLv250 said: Is it time to start serving some crow? And in case he edits it...
|
I cooked up a batch Claude.

I even made a nice setting for Kber 

| ClaudeLv250 said: Is it time to start serving some crow? And in case he edits it...
|
I cooked up a batch Claude.

I even made a nice setting for Kber 

Zlejedi said:
Previous one so far haven't even doubled it's first week sales. We will see if MH3 with a paid for online gameplay can mantain legs like PSP version. |
1) previous ones had 4 days in first week, MH3 had 2.
2) MH wasn't as popular back then
3) controller bundles appear to have sold out
currently playing: Skyward Sword, Mario Sunshine, Xenoblade Chronicles X
johnsobas said:
2) MH wasn't as popular back then 3) controller bundles appear to have sold out |
Munster Hunter wasn't popular 15 weeks ago? 
Zuhyc said:
Munster Hunter wasn't popular 15 weeks ago? |
I know what you're getting at but back when MH2 came out the game was far less popular, and didn't have the casual following the series does now on the PSP, it was mostly built on hardcore followers hence being so frontloaded. The question is whether some of those more casual players will see MH3 and jump over or not. That would determine whether the game has legs or not. Obviously it isn't gonna sell nearly as much as the PSP version but some of the success with casuals should carry over.
currently playing: Skyward Sword, Mario Sunshine, Xenoblade Chronicles X
johnsobas said:
|
What I'm saying is that the MH game you linked to was released 15 weeks ago. Monster Hunter was as popular 3 months ago than it is now.


Zuhyc said:
What I'm saying is that the MH game you linked to was released 15 weeks ago. Monster Hunter was as popular 3 months ago than it is now. |
Yeah, but wasn't that game a plain port, of two PSP-games no less, with nothing added, rather than a brand new entry into the franchise? Hardly comparable if you ask me.
Zuhyc said:
What I'm saying is that the MH game you linked to was released 15 weeks ago. Monster Hunter was as popular 3 months ago than it is now. |
Zlejedi is the one who posted the link, not johnsobas. And Monster Hunter G Wii is the port of a PS2 game, that was in a way a remake of the first Monster Hunter.
johnsobas said:
|
I don't think the japanese know what your talking about with that casual bs. I think japan is above the use of stereotypes and media branding/manipulation to sell violent games to teenagers, if they like a game they buy even if its got non HD graphics.
The rest of us are Uri Gellars spoons, bent to the whim of MS and Sony executives trying to keep any market share they still have.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
Yeah, but wasn't that game a plain port, of two PSP-games no less, with nothing added, rather than a brand new entry into the franchise? Hardly comparable if you ask me. |
Oh I'm not comparing them. Just pointing out that that argument doesn't make sense.


Zuhyc said:
Oh I'm not comparing them. Just pointing out that that argument doesn't make sense. |
Oh, well, alright then.