By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Assisted suicide: What is the law?

this is pretty much in every British newspaper today...

Source

Assisted suicide: what is the law?

Debbie Purdy has won a landmark court battle campaigners fear could lead to more people ending their lives in foreign "suicide clinics". But what does the law currently say?

 

:: What does the law currently say on assisted suicide?

The Suicide Act 1961 makes it an offence punishable by up to 14 years' imprisonment for anyone to aid, abet or procure the suicide or another.

No one has ever been prosecuted, even though dozens of Britons who have ended their lives at Dignitas, the Swiss "suicide clinic" over the past decade, have often been accompanied by friends or relatives.

:: Why does it need clarifying?

Debbie Purdy, in an argument now accepted by the Law Lords, said the legal position was not clear enough and that people were entitled to know exactly the circumstances under which they could be prosecuted for helping someone else end their life.

:: What happens now?

The Director of Public Prosecutions has ordered a Crown Prosecution Service team to produce an interim policy by the end of September. A public consultation on proposals will follow with a final policy announced in the spring of 2010.

:: What might the policy say?

The current situation allows the DPP to decline to prosecute those who help terminally ill loved ones end their suffering, while retaining the power to prosecute anyone who had pressured a family member into killing themselves for personal gain. The published policy is likely to simply make this explicit. It may also make reassurances that all cases will be investigated in case of foul play.

:: Could Parliament come up with a new law on assisted suicide?

The Law Lords made clear it was not their job to decriminalise assisted suicide and the DPP's statement also remarked on the absence of legislation. An attempt to legalise attempts by people to accompany loved ones to Dignitas was thwarted in the House of Lords just weeks ago. New amendments that would change the law could be tacked on to legislation passing through Parliament or an MP may seek to launch a Private Members' Bill. Given the strong public feeling and the publicity surrounding such cases, the Government may even choose to bring about primary legislation on assisted suicide.

 

 



Around the Network

It's amazing that the state can basically tell a person that they don't have the right to end their own life when they simply want to die with dignity or to end what amounts to years of pain and suffering.



Legend11 said:
It's amazing that the state can basically tell a person that they don't have the right to end their own life when they simply want to die with dignity or to end what amounts to years of pain and suffering.

No, the state dictates that a person may end their life however they wish as long as they do ot involve other people.



If there is an accident that leaves a woman disfigured but she is otherwise healthy and she gets a doctor to end her life is that Assisted Suicide or is that Murder?

These debated tend to focus on the most extreme cases, but (for the most part) the people who are against the legalization of assisted suicide are trying to prevent the bar from being lowered to an unacceptable level. Over time the standards of acceptable practices in situations like this will evolve, and it is likely that people who have viable medical options left and the potential for a very acceptable standard of living will seek out (and probably find) unethical doctors who will ignore their obvious depression and help them end their life.



I hate to be so crass, but why do people need assistance in killing themselves? It's not hard.



 

 

Around the Network

it's been argued before that Doctors are allowed to withdraw life-preserving medication, treatment, equipment etc in order for a person's life to end, but they aren't allowed to take an active role. always seemed a bit silly to me, when that causes unnecessary suffering.

i can understand the legal implications though, the system could be abused. but good on that woman anyway, for fighting what she believes in!



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.

Assisted suicide is treading a very thin line.



Why would you need help killing yourself?



4 ≈ One

As much as suicide is horrible (someone close to my family killed themselves a few years back), I have nothing against a person killing themselves. Its their body. As for assisted suicide I'm not necessarily against it, but only if the person is so debilitated they can't do the act themselves. But even then it definitely treads a very fine line.



If you allow this, the question is where does it stop?