wow, most cameras have that bad motion blur that you wouldn't want in screens from a video game, which is why the GT ones look better. Really quite amazing though.
wow, most cameras have that bad motion blur that you wouldn't want in screens from a video game, which is why the GT ones look better. Really quite amazing though.
Only got 8 of 15, heh. All I care about is not misidentifying an Evo, so I did okay in my book. :)
You do not have the right to never be offended.
I got all 15, but i've seen lots of vids and screen shots and played the hell out of GT:HD. To us the test maybe easy, but i bet if you showed this to the average person they could not tell the difference.
12/15
I mostly got the right ones by looking at the lightning, GT tries to keep that a bit too simplistic (tubes etc). And even on that resolution you can see that the (banners) textures are low in quality, yet thats only due to memory constraints.
But it is indeed impressive, yet the only racing game i liked it beetle adventure racing...
10/15
I knew that GT5 looks good but until now I didn't realize its so realistic.
13, got the subaru one wrong and the last ferarri one.....i do wonder waht those lines across the screen are for the last ferrari one, looked like a poor quality camcorder, yet that's GT?....the others were generally easy for the opposite way round (poor quality real picture)

About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.



