By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - inFamous has still way worser graphics than Gta Iv..

kibebr on 23 July 2009

inFamous RULEZ..... in graph dept.... no doubt...

So much xbots... oh.. oh...



PSN: franco-br
MGS4, GH, MW2, GT5p, WipeoutHD, etc..etc..

Around the Network
Slimebeast on 23 July 2009

Actually it is possible to make open world/sandbox games absolutely fantastic looking.

Just look at Oblivion, Far Cry 3 and Assassin's Creed.



Dallinor on 23 July 2009

Well according to wikipedia:

Sucker Punch Productions:
-Less than 60 devs.
-3 Years to make.
-New Engine Built.
-Budget unknown.

Rockstar North:
-150 devs (1000 people in total.)
-3 and a half Years.
-Parts Of Old Engine Used.
-Approx. $100 million.

There is a massive scale difference between the two projects.



 

sabby_e17 on 23 July 2009

I think the graphics look perfect. Plus a game like Infamous dose'nt need great graphics.




fadetoone on 23 July 2009

Worser is a word, but it's crappy english.

GTA IV didn't even have great graphics in my opinion.



Around the Network
Serious_frusting on 23 July 2009
CGI-Quality said:
Xen said:
Dgc1808 said:
1) I think inFamous look better in every way.
2) Good Graphics do not equal Good Game
3) I think I'm the only person alive that things inFamous was a good looking game... perhaps it's just my monitor but inFamous looked alot better than GTA4.
4) Graphics aren't everything.

No. Me too!

Me as well. In fact, there were definitely aspects in inFAMOUS that exceeded GTA IV, IMO, graphically. However fun factor, again IMO, there was no contentest, inFAMOUS was way more fun. To me the top sandbox games this gen are....

- inFAMOUS

-Prototype

-Saints Row 2

GTA IV didn't pull me in the way these did, they were so satisfying in their own ways.


Good minds think alike

Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

Phrancheyez on 23 July 2009
Simulacrum said:

Well I have been playing inFamous and Gta Iv lost and damned few days now and inFamous has very bad graphics...Cole and his powers are well done but all others are just medicore..

So it just came to my mind, how great game it would have been if it would have had Gta Iv graphics..

Wonder why didin't they make good as or better graphics tho Gta Iv was launched last year.

Is it because of money?Experience with open world games?

And wonder why inFamous has same animation as in Sly coopers..

I'm disappointed in the quality of this post=/  I know you to bring it better than this.

Graphics don't make great games.  Ever.  I'll buy a brand new game with NES graphics if the gameplay is on point.  InFamous' gameplay is ON POINT.

That said, the graphics in InFamous look good to me.  You make it sound as if we really are seeing NES graphics. I played through and beat the game twice, and have started to play through a 2nd time and I never once thought, "Man, they SO could have textured this sidewalk better!"



COKTOE on 23 July 2009
Barozi said:
HeroeDeLeyenda said:
Crackdown a 2-3 year old game looks a lot better than infamous

I would say it looks different, because it has a not so realistic artstyle.


infamous does some things better than Crackdown, but Crackdown had cripser graphics and a better framerate. Yes, the art syles are different, but for my tastes Crackdown gets the visual edge over inFamous.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

Slimebeast on 23 July 2009

You PS3 owners should buy Infamous.

We need to support all sandbox games. It's the best architecture for a game.



Taz! on 23 July 2009

^ You 360 owners should buy a PS3 for inFamous