Timeshift? More like Timeshite.

Sorry, but that game was garbage........... sure, it had gimmicks, but they were implemented poorly.

Actually from what i hear Halo: Reach is the next big official Halo title complete with a new SP campaign, and a new MP.  Its technically Halo 4 but they can't name a game Halo 4 because the masterchief story (supossedly) ended with Halo 3.  They didn't call it finishing the fight for no reason with 3.

And if developers can milk a game, yet still make virtually every release very good then more power to them

And do you like Gears of War 2 Horde mode at all?

*Slaps Ron*

You might want to punch me next............... why?............. cos even Prey, Frontlines: fuel of war and Quake 4 own Time shite

I would suppose its because Halo perfected multiplayer, and 5 years after Halo 2 still no one else has been able to even match that in longevity. hell, what other FPS can you turn into a racing game where you only have the guns of the back of the cars to stop the other team from getting the most laps while holding the blue flag on a custom made map with over 16 people? And if you manage to get them out of the car you have to duke it out samurai style with two/three clashing swords? And there is only one gun in the map, the almighty laser, with which  takes a fairly accurate shot to control. meanwhile while racing your own team, the other team sets up traps and ambushes along the way that the the other team must constantly avoid with the flag.

O_O *GASP* ... BLASPHEMY!!!!

*Drop-Kicks Ron Drake Style!!11*

I bought Halo for the PC a few years ago.  I mean, it was a good 5-6 years after all the hype, so I was hoping I could enjoy it...

First of all, vehicle sequences are usually a lot of fun... but Halo ruined the controls by having you "point" the vehicles rather than directly steering them.  I got used to it... but driving the Warthog was never as fun as it should have been.

The campaign was extremely repetetive.  It honestly felt like it would have been a good 5-6 hour game, which was ruined by some designers who just copy/pasted levels.  I recall about 2/3 of the way through, I would destroy a room full of enemies, go across a bridge, and be confronted with an identical room on the other side... and when I went through that room, an identical bridge... I almost quit playing after playing the same bridge 3 or 4 times because I didn't feel like I was accomplishing anything.

Overall, the game was okay... but it doesn't compete with Half Life, Half Life 2, System Shock 2, Deus Ex, or many of the other fantastic FPS's out for PC at the time.  If the game was just released on PC, it would gotten mid-high 80's for score, and probably would have been forgotten shortly after. 

(Hopefully you see that I'm not just trolling, I actually took the time to answer your question...)

Prey.............. Good story, good weapons, gravity defying walking.

Frontlines: fuel of war........... Lots of great remote control weapons to aid you in your fight.

Quake 4............. Huge game, takes tonnes of hours to complete, great online.......

Time shite............ Never anybody online, short game, poor AI, gimmicky weapons.

So............ what comes after the drop kick seraphic? lol

o-gawd...

Prey was "ALRIGHT" but Frontlines and Quake4...

You... You... Blasphemous heathen...

Oh ima so gonna buy you TimeShift 360 litmited edition for $12 and make you play it in a closed box and make makingmusic eat the key! lulz!

Don't you be sassin' Quake 4 It was awesome