BBH said:
kennyrester said:
kowenicki said:
Yeah, was on a flight last night so missed the game..
Just finished watching it. No problems really, dodgy goalkeeping moment and rooney playing quite badly aside I thought we did ok.
Heskey and Gerrard were superb I thought. we will qualify easily.
If the US had actually trued to play in the second half rathert than just sit back then we would have nicked as few goals.
Usual hysteria when we dont smash 3 or 4 goals from the press and people who only watch football once every 4 years.... we will be fine. The US will bore their way through too.
|
What were you watching? The USA are a team of journeymen and England resorted to lumping the ball up to Heskey/Crouch for the entire match. Why aren't you depressed by that? Other than assisting the goal Heskey created sweet fuck all. He gave the ball away as much as he won it, against very average defenders. All that's expected of him is the odd knock down and he just about did that acceptably, but missed an absolute sitter at 1-1.
I was very surprised England played that badly, they're an immensely talented team. Rooney didn't play badly, he got no service as your disfunctional Gerrard-Lampard midfield were unsurprisingly rubbish and were bypassed by the long ball. The USA tried to play more than England when they had the ball and actually attempted to string a couple of passes together but were let down by a general lack of talent.
The only thing you said that I do agree with is that you will qualify easily, and probably in first place
|
What team has shown their immense talent so far? Argentina looked alright but Nigeria had opportunities, France looked mediocre, Mexico stunk, etc, etc. The players haven't been together for long and will gradually improve.
Heskey was involved with basically everything in the USA's half, he just needs to be clinical and watch the offside. I'd rather have Crouch up there, he scores in internationals.
The USA aren't an average team either, they are in the top 15 in the World. If it wasn't for a howler and missed chances, England would have comfortably beat a top 15 team by around 3 goals to nil.
And for reference, England drew 0-0 with Uruguay in their first game in the year they won it.
|
So if it wasn't for poor English play they would have won the game comfortably? That must be very encouraging.
Heskey was involved with everything because the ball was passed long to him at every opportunity, but how many times did he miscontrol, get tackled or give the ball away? Lots, that's how many.He did nothing of value after the goal.
No team has looked immensely talented so far, but only two of the big boys, Argentina and England, have played, and Argentina looked more impressive. You could say all the other teams haven't been together long and will improve too, so that's irrelevant.
Look at the players in the USA team and tell me they aren't average. Look at who Heskey was up against, a Milan (Onyewu) reserve and a Watford reject (deMerit). In fact, they're ranked 14th and they're in a 32 team tournament (although 2 of the teams ahead of them didn't make it to the world cup) what isn't average about that? Anyway,as we all know, FIFA rankings are bullshit.