twesterm said:
- You should probably try a few 's before you talk about them. I can't talk about WoW much because I didn't get much into it, but FFXI actually has a pretty engaging story. Even WoW though, the little I have played of it has story and background, it's just up to you, the player, to get into that story. You can say those stories are crap, but they aren't any worse than Halo or Battlefield.
- It's funny you talk about plot and then you list Battlefield 1943
- It's even funnier that you then talk about playing them online
- Every game has repition, it's mainly just a matter of the type of game you like. I play something like Halo online and it's the same thing over and over and over again to me.
- I've just returned to FFXI after a two year break and I'm not lagging behind except for just being rusty and that would come with most any game after a two year break. They added new things but they aren't that hard to grasp.
- You can actually make the argument that MMO's are cheaper because rather than buying a new game every month at $60 you're paying ~$15 (price changes depending on the game) a month for the same game but a game that continues to be interesting for hundreds of hours.
|
there's a difference between games like Battlefield, Halo and WoW. i played a lot of mmorpgs, mostly free(Tibia, Flyff, Runescape etc.), but also Ragnarok and WoW and to me outside of Gunz which is basically a tps all of them are bout grinding and nothing else - at first it's fun but later it get's boring. online games and MMOs are 2 different things.
when i was talking bout story i meant singleplayer-kind-of experience - in mmos you just are in the world doing missions and that's it.