Wasn't one part of the camera already priced at 50 dollars? I think it was one of the lens.
Wasn't one part of the camera already priced at 50 dollars? I think it was one of the lens.
kiefer23 said:
 It has paid off for them this generation. |
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
well the only problem we could of had with Natal was the price, but now we know it's less than $50.
| deathgod33 said: well the only problem we could of had with Natal was the price, but now we know it's less than $50. |
What part of "Pachter" didn't you understand?
While it may be "superior" technically because of the skeletal recognition, I still think you need some buttons on a hand held device like nintendo and sony's approach to motion control. Otherwise, it's just a more sophisticated eyetoy.
I think $129 is a reasonable price. $99 would be a dream price.
$50 is just Patcher-talk.
I don't understand why people think 100 dollars for a peripheral is a good price...
I doesn't matter how much they sell it for.
If it takes 200$ to make, and MS sells it for 50$, and they plan to sell >10 million, then they're going to be in trouble.
Wii has more 20 million sellers than PS3 has 5 million sellers.
Acolyte of Disruption
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.