Edge rate games from 1-10, so this isn't as bad as initially thought.

Prinny got a 4?! That's bigger BS than The Conduit!

Who is Edge? I mean, where is the actual written review on the flaws in the game? I mean just like age is nothing but a number, the same can be said about review scores.

Actual, physical written opinion would match the score but obvioiously there isn't a written review from Edge, so moving along.

/thread

you wii owners should stop getting so upset about the ratings for The Conduit. I've seen it a lot lately.

Yes, there is. Edge is a magazine, which is why we don't have the full review, just the number.

@Rainbird

So why is it that Gamepro can actually have a written review for us and not Edge? O_O

I love Edge, even when they gave Halo Wars a low score, they don't care about the shitstorm they just tell it how it is.

LOl win..

Anyone bother to READ the Edge review to see WHY it got a 4 out of 10? Anyone who complains about the score, without actually knowing WHY, then you are showing signs of being one of the worst type of fanboys on the planet... a Wii Fanboy. Why do I say a Wii Fanboy is one of the worst? A Wii Fanboy demonstrates the worst traits of all fanboys, in defense of a system whose graphics are the worst of this generation, which is designed for CASUAL fun, targeting non-gamers. In other words, it is for a system for people who have lives, and other things, who like motion control to do things they normally don't do on a game console.

When you hang on every single blasted numeric rating for a non-casual game on the Wii, in hopes that SOMEHOW this will result in a change in sales, and for HD driven core gamers to stop snickering at waggle, in hopes that they will accept you are core, then you lack balance. At least buy a HD console if you can't have balance, as your being upset would be more appropriate in the realm of PS3 or 360 fanboys than with the normal Wii user.

But Gameinformer publishes their reviews online and their the top selling gaming magazine in the US.