Alterego-X said:
BladeOfGod said: Why do we have to have the thread with this question every 2 months???
Just because wii is selling faster doesnt mean its gonna outsell PS2. GBA was selling faster than PS2 as well but it didnt outsold it because when DS came out, GBA pretty much died. That's how Nintenndo consoles/handhelds works. When the next one comes out the last one dies. |
It is ridiculous! Your theory suggests that regardless of the object itself, and even the company's plan with it, any console with "Nintendo" written on it is predestinated to die after a successor is released, while the "Sony/Playstation" brands give a magical boost to the longetivity.
PS1, PS2, and, as Arius Dion pointed out, the NES, were popular for an extraordinary long time, because they were already the most popular consoles to begin with. It is the customers who keep alive a console, by buying it. This is why Sony's ten year plan sounds ridiculous, too. They might keep it on the market, if they wish, but with the PS3's lack of an early momentum, but unless they somehow make it appealing, people won't keep buying it just because it is Sony.
GBA must be an unique case, as it wasn't even discuntinued by Nintendo at the DS's release, people just stopped buying it. But I'm sure that somehow it was the product's fault, and not the Curse Of The Nintendo Logo, that forced people to leave it on the shelves.
The Wii may suffer the same fate, if somehow they commited the same business mistake as with the GBA, or not, if they didn't.
|