By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Shia LaBeouf (Transformers) calls Wii "an amateur console"

Ryudo said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Ryudo said:

Even if the Wii is a so called "amatur console" in the end it's still a console.

 

I could call Shia La Beouf a "amateur actor" but I can't because to be an actor you have to know how to act in the first place.

Oh and seeing this animated gif in someones sig made me chuckle and made me think maybe he was just gearing up to fight this in the latest film.


Shia LeBeouf can act. I remember one time I saw him play a mentally challenged child, for the Disney channel, when I was younger. It was pretty good.

If it was on the disney channel then it wasn't acting.  They are mentally challenged.


What? The Disney Channel isn't retarded. The Disney Channel is the evil breeding ground for the next top stars in Hollywood. Last generation it was Justin Timberlake, Christina Aguilera, Ryan Gosseling and Britney Spears. The next generation it's Shia Lebeouf, Lindsey Lohan and those kids from High School Musical. I mean its quite obvious what they've been doing. Those people are evil geniuses, who make teen idols in a fucking factory! After they rear them properly, they ship them to Hollywood!



Around the Network

great another 21 comments, im starting to get weary of this thread. Leave the man alone i consider him a decent actor but not a gamer. After finishing the latest haruhi manga im in a great mood. ROFLMAO Random pics like that (shia eating a banana) crack me up.



@S.T.A.G.E.: There were a lot of misconceptions in your posts. Allow me to correct some of the errors.

One of your biggest mistakes is thinking people upstream from Nitnendo to Sony/Microsoft. If this was true, then why isn't the PS3 doing better (as all these users would be upstreaming, even back from the Gamecube days). But if the consumers move towards the PS3/360, but start with Nintendo, shouldn't Nintendo always have the largest user base. I mean, most people should be average or near the bottom. Why wasn't the Gamecube beating out the PS2? None of it adds up (NOTE:For those that understand the Blue Ocean Strategy, this will make lots of sense).

You misunderstood your experience to happen in the hear and now. Here is how it goes: The market was shrinking when Nintendo and Sega were duking it out in a Red Ocean. So, the users were more and more core (or hardcore). The PS1 moved gaming into the cinematic era (which was the greatest period of contraction in gaming) where games were defined by the new technology (Fun fact: this is ending because the 360 and PS3 are overshooting consumers. Gaming is starting to get back to interface and user interaction). You moved to Sony becuase Sony made cinamatic games. The new thing. Nintendo didn;t use CDs, so they couldn't compete.

Wii users will upstream to harder Wii games, not to PS3 or 360 games. Think about it, does mom, grandma, or your sister want to rip someone's head off in God of War? Do they want to waste 100 hrs. of their time with Final Fantasy? Do you they want to, robotically, press buttons as they appear on the screen in Heavy Rain? Nope. None of it. There games will hate violence (one reason why the industry was so male dominated because there was too much violence). They don't spend much time on the Wii in one sitting, so I doubt they want to play a time sink game. And I doubt the Wii for it's deep story and cinamatics. None of it adds up.

OH, and let me tell you something. Platformers are hardcore. They are more hardcore then most of the movie games you've played on the HD twins. Yeah, Heavy Rain is easy mode. Same for GTA, Halo and MGS. It was all about precision, timing, and speed. I mean, Megaman is hardcore to the max and more hardcore then most games today. And don't get me started on the arcade games.

Also, Wii gamers do want to progress their skills. They just want to do it in Wii Sports and Mario Kart.



Smashchu2 said:
@S.T.A.G.E.: There were a lot of misconceptions in your posts. Allow me to correct some of the errors.

One of your biggest mistakes is thinking people upstream from Nitnendo to Sony/Microsoft. If this was true, then why isn't the PS3 doing better (as all these users would be upstreaming, even back from the Gamecube days). But if the consumers move towards the PS3/360, but start with Nintendo, shouldn't Nintendo always have the largest user base. I mean, most people should be average or near the bottom. Why wasn't the Gamecube beating out the PS2? None of it adds up (NOTE:For those that understand the Blue Ocean Strategy, this will make lots of sense).

People did upstream from Nintendo to Sony. The Playstation and Playstation 2 era was proof of that...and even in those gens Nintendo had the cheapest system. The Wii has thrown everything off course, because it attracted a totally different crowd. I am sure, that Nintendo got sick of waiting for more third parties and the Hardcore. Most people who played the HD consoles originally had a Nintendo or Sega Genesis (IE: The Golden Age of gaming). After the Golden Age, gamers poured into the Playstation, because that console took gaming to the next level, despite Sony being pricks and taking all the cool names away from Nintendo like Metal Gear, Final Fantasy, most potential Enix titles and Capcom titles. The Gamecube didn't beat out the PS2, because the Gamecube was low on games until the end of its lifespan, not to mention the fact that Sony had sucked up all of Nintendo's noteriety and marketshare. By the time Nintendo got some credible third party franchises on the GC, the war was over. This problem doesn't have anything to do with the PS3 issue. That is an issue of Sony's arrogance coupled with the price of the PS3. Now that Microsoft is here, sucking up what could've been Sony's HD market...Nintendo would've been in neck and neck with Sony.

 

You misunderstood your experience to happen in the hear and now. Here is how it goes: The market was shrinking when Nintendo and Sega were duking it out in a Red Ocean. So, the users were more and more core (or hardcore). The PS1 moved gaming into the cinematic era (which was the greatest period of contraction in gaming) where games were defined by the new technology (Fun fact: this is ending because the 360 and PS3 are overshooting consumers. Gaming is starting to get back to interface and user interaction). You moved to Sony becuase Sony made cinamatic games. The new thing. Nintendo didn;t use CDs, so they couldn't compete.

The market during the Nintendo and Sega era was small, but growing steadily. The arcade market in the U.S. shrunk into nothingness as the gaming industry expanded. It made western gamers lazy. Most of the hardcore gamers of today were kids during the Sega/ Nintendo era. The PS1 didn't move gaming into the cinematic era, because PC's had already done that. The PS1 and N64 were on par in the graphics area. The PS1 had the edge with sound, and sometimes certain N64 games had to use small sound bytes. I didn't move to Sony, because Sony adopted CD technology (which is what I think you meant); I favored Sony (while also having Nintendo systems), because they moneyhatted like a madman and sucked up all the good third party games and bought all the first party.

 

Wii users will upstream to harder Wii games, not to PS3 or 360 games. Think about it, does mom, grandma, or your sister want to rip someone's head off in God of War? Do they want to waste 100 hrs. of their time with Final Fantasy? Do you they want to, robotically, press buttons as they appear on the screen in Heavy Rain? Nope. None of it. There games will hate violence (one reason why the industry was so male dominated because there was too much violence). They don't spend much time on the Wii in one sitting, so I doubt they want to play a time sink game. And I doubt the Wii for it's deep story and cinamatics. None of it adds up.

The majority of Wii owners will not upstream. The majority of them don't care to upstream. Only a minority of actual Wii users are already gamers or potential gamers in the making. The Wii was not meant for upstreaming. Only those who grasp gaming will catch on. Unless Nintendo changes their ways, a good portion of the potential gamers (IE: Kids and transitioning casuals) will eventually get bored and move on.

 

OH, and let me tell you something. Platformers are hardcore. They are more hardcore then most of the movie games you've played on the HD twins. Yeah, Heavy Rain is easy mode. Same for GTA, Halo and MGS. It was all about precision, timing, and speed. I mean, Megaman is hardcore to the max and more hardcore then most games today. And don't get me started on the arcade games.

Super Mario Galaxy is a mascot platformer. It is not hardcore. GTA is more hardcore than Mario....but Zelda is another story. Zelda and Metroid are the most hardcore mascot games for Nintendo. Zelda and Metroid take skill. You've got the conduit, no more heroes and Madworld and a couple others which are mature, which are new IP's, but as I said, so few.

Also, Wii gamers do want to progress their skills. They just want to do it in Wii Sports and Mario Kart.

Wii gamers may want to progress their skills by owning all systems, but most Wii owners...do not care to. With the bulk of Nintendo's games being focused on everyone, where does that leave the hardcore? The Wii will eventually hit a plateau effect with most of the hardcore. I don't care that Nintendo has focused on the casual as long as they are making money. As I've said before, Nintendo is the gate keeper and innovator of the gaming industry. They bring more potential gamers into the gaming ring than any platformer. They did it with me when I was four years old and they can do it with others. The Wii has proven this.

 



This was fun two pages ago >_>



Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:
9Chiba said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
9Chiba said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
9Chiba said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
TX109 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
TX109 said:

everyone who claims that shia's being bashed just because he doesn't like the wii need to reread what he said. he basically bashed the entire wii user base, and he has never played the console. opinions are fine, but this guy hasn't even touched a wii. he has no right to use such harsh words.

let it be known that i still plan on seeing transformers 2. also, although Megan Fox is a twit, id still hit that. XD


You don't need to play the Wii to know that it is geared towards casual gamers rather than the hardcore.


right, but to state that its for "amateur" players is just wrong. i dont really view myself as an "amateur". the wii may have a lot of casual games, but they don't all suck, like he's implying.

don't forget that the wii has its fair share of core and challenging games....


Casual does mean Amateur, but because they don't want to progress their gaming skills. Would you rather I said novice? The Wii may have challenging games...but the amount of those games, do not warrent a purchase from a hardcore gamer. Casuals can get full value out of that system.

look, no matter what anyone says, ALL GAMES use progression of skills. what hardcore gamers have that casuals dont is the understanding  of most games in general; they can pick up just about any game and play it because theyve played many many games before and developed the "sense". casual games are ones that only require common sense. the wii only amplifies this, because of its intuitive controls. hardcore gamers tend to hate casual gamers because they didnt have to work hard for their fun. which makes sense.... sort of.


You just admitted that the Wii is a start up system, without actually saying it. Most people who buy Wii's are not going to upgrade. You also hit the nail on the head for while most hardcore gamers cannot tolerate casual games. Hardcore gamers are a minority, but their voice still holds a lot of weight.

youre funny. i was actually neutral and adding to your point, but since you insist on treating everyone who doesnt hail your HD consoles as the center of gaming, i guess ill just jump in.

 

hm, i guess it could be a startup system. but it certainly isnt single sided. plenty of hardcore. besides, its not like this simple-button, easy to figure out thing started with the wii. its in pretty much all of nintendo's games. wii just has waggle.

 

and another thing. dont say upgrade. i dont find the PS3 better than the wii.

 

aaaand finally, how many people do you think bought the PS3 or Xbox because "they heard the graphics were like krazy!"? the truth is, casual lies in your precious HD systems too. people who play games where one button makes you enter a long (albeit beautiful) and boring cutscene where some guy rips off another's head or slams him into a wall. the ridiculously good-looking games that make people go "nice graphics" even though the gameplay sucks ass. the button mashing games (Yes, im looking at your precious tekken. i love the fact that it has character depth, story and fighting styles, but i hate how i can own someone without practice). games that have oh-so-many tracks, maps, cars or weapons. oh and your fapping games. forgot about those. these games are a STRONG part of(pretty much most of) the HD library. they just have M or T slapped on to them, to fool people into thinking theyre elite. yes, you can argue that the triple A games on HD consoles are ridiculously hardcore, and i cant disagree. but like 20-30 games in a library of 500, 800, 1000?

I never said that the Playstation 3 is subjectively better, when I say upgrading. When I say that someone is upgrading to HD, they are upgrading their know-how of gaming and are entering a new realm. It is kind of like playing music; I play guitar and sing, so I know about progressing and wanting increase the quality of my sound. I want to play harder songs and learn newer styles. I never forget where I came from, but I upgrade to be current...and most importantly, because the challenge keeps me on my toes. Nintendo are the masters of pulling non-gamers into gaming...like they did with me when I was four years old. I was a dedicated Nintendo owner, until I bought the Playstation, which basically sucked up all the good games. I still had the 64, but as I grew up Playstation provided the more mature titles that I wanted to play. In the Playstation era, I was in middle school, so yeah. Playstation 2 was highschool, and the beginning of the next gen was college, so there you have it. It was a long process, in which I grew into the difficulty and diversity of games. Nintendo may be making all the money, but they create start-up systems. They are the innovators and the gate keepers for the console gaming industry. Microsft and Sony are the scavengers, who pick up the pieces. I gladly went for the scavengers, because as I grew as a gamer, they provided. Until Nintendo caters to me, I have no use for it. This is also a reason some of my friends who only had Wii's upgraded to 360's. They loved the party games, but got bored after a while, because of the lack of cool games coming out. Well E3 has shown some great games, but they seem to be in a 360 trance right now. My friends who own the PS3 are few, so I am alone there. I have only one friend who solely owns the Wii, and he is trying to kill off playing videogames so he can focus on "more important things", as he puts it. Technically the Wii exists so he can play with his girl and stay away from hardcore gaming, but everytime he comes to hang with us, he gets tempted to buy an HD system (which he can more than afford). He is a huge fan of team ICO games.

First of all, PS360 games aren't all one button kill games. This is why there are sixteen to eighteen buttons on the controller. They are there so you can inflict a maximum amount of carnage in action games, make realistic plays in sports games and in shooters to be able to control your weaponry and not be stationary in the process. I am not a graphics over substance person, so don't write me off as one. There are plenty of quality games on both HD systems, that do have great graphics, but are quality games. In fact at this point, there are too many. You may not feel that way, but I respect that. Nintendo does offer a certain something, to certain people.

 

just as ps360 games arent all one-button kill games, wii isnt all party games, nor is it all simple games. and simple onebutton controls does not mean you can master the game without skill. it just means YOU have to figure out for yourself how the game works. as for your sixteen to eighteen button theory... im not sure about the 360 but the playstation 3 has 17 buttons; the L2 and R2 are rarely used. The home button is useless during gameplay, the select button is useless during gameplay, and the analog/dpad alternate; rarely are they used together. wii controller implements all 13 (minus the home button, and nunchuk motion as a button) buttons in most of nintendo's games. oh and please name your quality games, ill tell you which, by your definition, are casual and which are not, plus match a high quality nintendo game.


The Nintendo Wii is the king of Party games. There will be more Mario Party, Mario Kart, Wario ware, Wii Sports, Wii Fits, and Wii Resorts to come. The Wii has mature titles, but they are few and far between as opposed to the casual titles. The Wii is no place for a hardcore title to grow. PS3 and 360 are shot for party games besides for Viva Pinata, Little Big Planet, Rockband and Guitar Hero. Rock Band and Guitar Hero are already on the Wii so that increase the amount of Popular Party games that the Wii has on its already decorated roster. I almost forgot about Mario & Sonic at the Olympic games sold over 11 million copies between the Wii and the DS. Platformers=Casual. There might be some well crafted games on the Wii, but the mature titles that are worth buying are in low quantities.

The PS3 and 360 controllers have from 16-18 buttons. You seem to forget that on Xbox live you can use the home button, because you can have conversations with your friends and look up achievements to focus on, while playing. It is a second option box, just like the start button. L1 and L2 and R1 and R2 and their counter parts on the 360 are very valuable for use (Especially if you are playng sports, FPS or racing). In games like Mass Effect, the right and left top button are inventory buttons, which choose your weapons or powers. This is an argument that you cannot win. There are far too many great 360 and PS3 games to count, so i'll only give a few. I'll probably give more later.

 

All of these games are either from 8.5's to solid 10's. Find this many mature titles (not party games or platformers).

Street Fighter IV

Gears of War 1 & 2

Killzone 2

Uncharted: Drake's Fortune

Condemned 1 & 2

Lost Planet

Perfect Dark Zero

Red Faction: Guerilla

Halo 3

Halo Wars

Resistance 1 & 2

MGS4

Soul Calibur 4

Tales of Vesperia

Ratchet and Clank: Tools of Destruction

Call of Duty 4

Assassins Creed

Saints Row

Saints Row 2

Mass Effect

Grand Theft Auto IV

 

If I gave a true list it would be way longer, but this is just off the top of my head.

lol, cherry picking. what do scores have anything to do with hardcore? and ill disregard "platformers" and "mature titles" as i see fit. and i didnt "forget" 360 buttons cause ive never had one. ive played halo 3 and CoD.

titles that arent out yet ALREADY got an 8.5-10 AND have been proven hardcore?? 

tekken 6: button masher=casual

SC4: ditto

GoW: x-mashing game, casual

Prototype: x-mashing game, casual

heavenly sword: even easier to play than the other two

Gran Turismo: if you cut mario kart, im cutting this. there are less buttons to press, less things to do on the track. only reason you call mario kart a party game is because 4 people can enjoy it at once.

Forza 2: ditto.

Condemned 1: had... 1 button for attack. brilliant. casual. (condemned 2 ADDED an attack button. congratulations, it becomes hardcore)

Infamous: you CAN map buttons to a more complex control system, but casuals are just fine with mashing x

UFC undisputed: they tried to make it less button-masher-oriented by adding dodge but... really, it didnt work too well.

 

heres your new list:

Street Fighter IV

Gears of War 1 & 2

Killzone 2

Uncharted: Drake's Fortune

Condemned 1 & 2

Lost Planet

Perfect Dark Zero

Red Faction: Guerilla

Halo 3

Halo Wars

Resistance 1 & 2

MGS4

Soul Calibur 4

Tales of Vesperia

Ratchet and Clank: Tools of Destruction

Call of Duty 4

Assassins Creed

Saints Row

Saints Row 2

Mass Effect

Grand Theft Auto IV

 

25 titles, ill tack on 25 to be fair. (im aware you missed titles like portal, L4D, mirror's edge, and RE5)

 

heres mine:

Mario Galaxy

Okami

Resident Evil 4

LoZ; Twilight Princess

MP3: Corruption/MP Trilogy

Rune Factory Frontier

Tales of Symphonia: blah blah blah

Tenchu: Shadow Assassins

Resident Evil Archives

Brawl

Battalion Wars 2

Little King's Story

The Conduit

Murasama: Demon Blade

Red Steel

Overlord: Dark Legends

Zack and Wiki

Capcom vs. Tatsunoku

Super Paper Mario

Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn

Disaster: Day of Crisis

Mario Strikers Charged

FF: Crystal Chronicles Echoes of Time

Pokemon: Battle Revolution

Medal of Honor: Heroes 2

Brothers in Arms: Double Time

Castle of Shikigami III

Guilty Gear XX Accent Core Plus

Baroque

Deadly Creatures

 

couple of ports there, but no different from 360/PC

 

honestly, your argument, without saying it outright is: first and third person shooters are teh hardcore. PS3 and Xbox 360 have plenty of these. thus, they are hardcore systems. wii has 12 substandard shooters and a couple good ones. its a party system.

its pretty sad.

 

 

 



Im betting there will be 30-20+ more posts the next morning, afternoon, evening, night whatever.



LOL. Awesome Comments And It's Pretty Funny How The Wii Fans Are Reacting To This.



That last post from 9Chiba, including everything in the quote is probably the longest post in vgc history



 

 

 

 

 

Check out my pyro tf2 vid :)

 

Bet With routsounmanman: By the end of Q1 2008 Capcom WONT have announced a RE5 Wii Edition OR a new RE (classic gameplay) for the Wii (WON)

 

This's first time i know his name.He's France or something?