By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS3 Ghostbusters is NOT 75% of the Xbox resolution!!!!!!!!!

dbot on 18 June 2009

The PS3 version of this game is an epic failure. I know people will point to the difficulty of programming on the PS3, but this is just completely unacceptable. Most other multiplatform games are very similar in performance. The fact that they would even release the PS3 version at this resolution is beyond belief. I hope Sony can get a refund on their exclusivity deal in Europe.



Thanks for the input, Jeff.

 

 

Around the Network
hduser on 18 June 2009

Well I figured this would happen. When I first saw the specs of the PS3, I thought 256MB main memory would be a limiting factor someday even though the overhead for the OS than a typical windows OS. Sony should have ponied up to 512MB.



Hawk on 18 June 2009
dbot said:
The PS3 version of this game is an epic failure. I know people will point to the difficulty of programming on the PS3, but this is just completely unacceptable. Most other multiplatform games are very similar in performance. The fact that they would even release the PS3 version at this resolution is beyond belief. I hope Sony can get a refund on their exclusivity deal in Europe.

You find the resolution that friggin important?  You have not played the game, but because of the resolution you will not even give it a chance.  What happened to liking a game for gameplay?



Tag: Hawk - Reluctant Dark Messiah (provided by fkusumot)

thekitchensink on 18 June 2009
hduser said:
Well I figured this would happen. When I first saw the specs of the PS3, I thought 256MB main memory would be a limiting factor someday even though the overhead for the OS than a typical windows OS. Sony should have ponied up to 512MB.


Funny you should say that--I read once that Microsoft was originally only going to have 256MB of RAM in the 360, but then Epic showed them what Gears could look like with 512MB and they jumped on it



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
SaviorX on 18 June 2009
thekitchensink said:
SaviorX said:
I'm still not sure of what is wrong here....The PS3 version that we saw in the screenshots looked poorer at a LOWER resolution? So if expanded to 720p they would look worse?


They're saying that you should decrease the resolution of the 360 version screenshots for a fair comparison of the textures.


So if I lowered the resolution of the 360 version, I'm guessing the graphics would look much worse......

Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

Around the Network
dbot on 18 June 2009
Hawk said:
dbot said:
The PS3 version of this game is an epic failure. I know people will point to the difficulty of programming on the PS3, but this is just completely unacceptable. Most other multiplatform games are very similar in performance. The fact that they would even release the PS3 version at this resolution is beyond belief. I hope Sony can get a refund on their exclusivity deal in Europe.

You find the resolution that friggin important?  You have not played the game, but because of the resolution you will not even give it a chance.  What happened to liking a game for gameplay?

No, I find the disparity between the 2 versions to be a problem.  If you are going to release a multiplatform game, you should release the same game on both platforms.  Other developers are able to do it, why can't Terminal Reality.  To be honest, neither version are really offering much in terms of graphics.  

Obviously gameplay is important, but poor graphics are part of gameplay.  From what I've seen of the PS3 version, it is blurry as hell and that will ruin the gameplay for me.  



Thanks for the input, Jeff.

 

 

nojustno on 18 June 2009
haxxiy said:
lol at 540p, that's a record for multiplats I think, and second only to Star Ocean IV regarding crappy resolution on HD consoles.

It's only during battles to maintain 60fps. Normally its 720P I believe.




dbot on 18 June 2009
hduser said:
Well I figured this would happen. When I first saw the specs of the PS3, I thought 256MB main memory would be a limiting factor someday even though the overhead for the OS than a typical windows OS. Sony should have ponied up to 512MB.

Really?  Explain Uncharted, MGS4, Killzone 2, GT5P, etc

You get where I'm going with this?



Thanks for the input, Jeff.

 

 

darthdevidem01 on 18 June 2009

this is pathetic

I am not going to support developers like these, especially when there is PROOF that developers can do fabulous graphics on PS3

Ghostbusters looks neither technically fantastic, nor graphic heavy

I really don't know where the problem is for them



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

dsister44 on 18 June 2009

LoL.

typical.

twesterm must have sabotaged it