By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Windows 7 will not include Internet Explorer in EU markets.

WereKitten said:
DirtyP2002 said:
WereKitten said:
DirtyP2002 said:

Halo ODST will include a free multiplayer-beta for Halo Reach. MS needs to include a multiplayer beta for 3rd parties as well according to this. :D

This is sooo stupid. I can't believe MS is not allowed to offer something for FREE. You can transfer this to a lot of other products. So a Playstation bundle with Killzone 2 is not allowed either, because the customer won't try other games/shooters. This is more or less the same thing.

No, it isn't.

- MS starting point is a dominating position on the OS market. This makes them subject to extra scrutiny to make sure that this position doesn't transfer to limited competition in other related markets, say the browsers' one. If MS had a 5% market share for OSs, this would be a moot point.

- A game is not meant to be a substitute for all other games. A browser is meant to substitute competing browsers in everything, forever.


okay, what about iPod and iTunes?

What about it? I'm sorry but I'm ignorant about the state of their interaction and the way they treat DRM.

I tangentially know that most music programs used under Linux - including the one I'm most familiar with - can sync with iPods, and that other pieces of hardware can work with iTunes.


iTunes doesn't work with any other peice of hardware unless it's accedental (think a palm phone can synch with it for some odd reason), but you can't use Napster or any other service like iTunes with your iPod.  They force your only legal downloads to come from iTunes.  I don't have a problems with that, but for people who have hundreds of dollars invested in iTunes that's a problem if they want to switch to a Zune or Creative



Around the Network
NJ5 said:
Jereel Hunter said:
SamuelRSmith said:
I can't see how anyone could be in support of Microsoft for this. Microsoft are abusing their position in the Operating System market to gain in the browser market - that's anti-competitive behaviour.

You may be thinking "so what, they're free products" - but there's financial gain to be had from the browser market - why else do you think that Microsoft is acting in the way it is? Browsers gain revenue from people using the search bars in the corner, and it can also act as a way for Microsoft to push their own search and online services - more anti-competitive behaviour.

Microsoft also use the Windows-IE lock to try and create an IE-Windows lock. The more consumers get adjusted to Windows apps the less likely they are to go for alternative Operating Systems.

Microsoft's forced-monopoly in the browser market has led to a stagnation in the advancement of the web. What's the point in following web standards and embracing new web technologies if the market leading browser doesn't utilise them.

Anything a company does in order to gain an upper-hand over competition is "anti-competitive". MS gives away a browser for free, and it's bundled. Anyone that is against MS doesn't have a valid reason. You like a browser? download it. It's that easy. Download it with the freely installed IE. All those people that don't know enough to download another browser? Why should they simply not have one? The browsers are all freely available. And a browser like firefox is doing fine against IE. There's no reason to restrict a free option for people.

Let me put it this way. Remember when Nintendo had a monopoly of the handheld gaming market?

What would happen if Nintendo had bundled a "free" Nintendo 64 with each gameboy that they sold... That would practically give them domination of the console market by extension. It would be anti-competitive behavior too, and I'm sure that Sony and Sega would have made a lot of noise back then.

The situation with the browsers is analogous... the only difference is a browser is cheaper to make and distribute than a console, so it's easier for MS to pull off this trick.

 

I don't think that would be anti-competitive....

It would just be giving something away... for free.

If nintendo gave away free N64's bundled with the gameboy I don't believe anyone would of said anything outside of some snide PR.



Cueil said:


iTunes doesn't work with any other peice of hardware unless it's accedental (think a palm phone can synch with it for some odd reason), but you can't use Napster or any other service like iTunes with your iPod.  They force your only legal downloads to come from iTunes.  I don't have a problems with that, but for people who have hundreds of dollars invested in iTunes that's a problem if they want to switch to a Zune or Creative

It's not accidental, of course... interfacing with iTunes is a feature of pieces of hardware such as the Palm Pre.

As to someone forcing your only legal downloads to come from iTunes, let me say: "uh?"

Build your MP3/AAC library any way you want and a plethora of software tools will allow you to organize it in playlists and sync with your iPod.

Unless you buy something like a DRM-locked WMA file that your iPod won't play, but then you're the culprit. When you accept to pay money for a DRM-encumbered content, you're accepting that you will be restricted in the way you manage and playback that content. But it's not as if there's no choice: I don't think there's music out there that is exclusive to a given DRM format.

iTunes does sell DRM-free versions of all its content for what I know, and you can manage and play that music however and wherever you want.



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman

Kasz216 said:
NJ5 said:

Let me put it this way. Remember when Nintendo had a monopoly of the handheld gaming market?

What would happen if Nintendo had bundled a "free" Nintendo 64 with each gameboy that they sold... That would practically give them domination of the console market by extension. It would be anti-competitive behavior too, and I'm sure that Sony and Sega would have made a lot of noise back then.

The situation with the browsers is analogous... the only difference is a browser is cheaper to make and distribute than a console, so it's easier for MS to pull off this trick.

 

I don't think that would be anti-competitive....

It would just be giving something away... for free.

If nintendo gave away free N64's bundled with the gameboy I don't believe anyone would of said anything outside of some snide PR.

I think it's anti-competitive to purposefully lose money in order to drive competitors away. Otherwise you're just asking for big companies to easily own a lot of markets (then becoming even bigger and more capable of crushing others).

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

NJ5 said:
Kasz216 said:
NJ5 said:

Let me put it this way. Remember when Nintendo had a monopoly of the handheld gaming market?

What would happen if Nintendo had bundled a "free" Nintendo 64 with each gameboy that they sold... That would practically give them domination of the console market by extension. It would be anti-competitive behavior too, and I'm sure that Sony and Sega would have made a lot of noise back then.

The situation with the browsers is analogous... the only difference is a browser is cheaper to make and distribute than a console, so it's easier for MS to pull off this trick.

 

I don't think that would be anti-competitive....

It would just be giving something away... for free.

If nintendo gave away free N64's bundled with the gameboy I don't believe anyone would of said anything outside of some snide PR.

I think it's anti-competitive to purposefully lose money in order to drive competitors away. Otherwise you're just asking for big companies to easily own a lot of markets (then becoming even bigger and more capable of crushing others).

 

Isn't that more or less what videogame companys do all the time?

I mean they loss lead like crazy... except for Nintendo. 



Around the Network

@Kasz216: Yeah but they are not dominating the market so people just let them happily lose money.



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

NJ5 said:
@Kasz216: Yeah but they are not dominating the market so people just let them happily lose money.

What about the PS2?  That loss lead... and the PS2 ended up dominating the market...

 



Kasz216 said:
NJ5 said:
@Kasz216: Yeah but they are not dominating the market so people just let them happily lose money.

What about the PS2?  That loss lead... and the PS2 ended up dominating the market...

 

But they got profitable pretty quickly, and on their own didn't really do enough to eliminate the competition.

I don't know to what extent they'd need to loss lead to create problems for themselves... I'm guessing it depends on a lot of factors, including the importance of the industry, how much the competitors complain and the past behavior of the company.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

WereKitten said:
Cueil said:


iTunes doesn't work with any other peice of hardware unless it's accedental (think a palm phone can synch with it for some odd reason), but you can't use Napster or any other service like iTunes with your iPod.  They force your only legal downloads to come from iTunes.  I don't have a problems with that, but for people who have hundreds of dollars invested in iTunes that's a problem if they want to switch to a Zune or Creative

It's not accidental, of course... interfacing with iTunes is a feature of pieces of hardware such as the Palm Pre.

As to someone forcing your only legal downloads to come from iTunes, let me say: "uh?"

Build your MP3/AAC library any way you want and a plethora of software tools will allow you to organize it in playlists and sync with your iPod.

Unless you buy something like a DRM-locked WMA file that your iPod won't play, but then you're the culprit. When you accept to pay money for a DRM-encumbered content, you're accepting that you will be restricted in the way you manage and playback that content. But it's not as if there's no choice: I don't think there's music out there that is exclusive to a given DRM format.

iTunes does sell DRM-free versions of all its content for what I know, and you can manage and play that music however and wherever you want.

You use excuses and work arounds... and no it's not all DRM free if it was I could plug my GF iPod into my 360 and play back her music... I can't.  I can play back the music she burned from her own stash, but downloaded music is a no go.  Apple has a choke hold on the market that's almost painful to watch and the whole reason is that got their foot in to the door first and now if you have tons of iTunes purchases you're probably going to be stuck and even if all music was non-DRM most people still don't understand and most devices don't play back AAC(is that correct... been out of the loop for a little while).  I think someone from Gizmondo said it best on a tech interview I watched about ZuneHD... "What most people will ask when they see it is 'can I use iTunes with this?' the answer is no and so they'll never get it"



Cueil said:

You use excuses and work arounds... and no it's not all DRM free if it was I could plug my GF iPod into my 360 and play back her music... I can't.  I can play back the music she burned from her own stash, but downloaded music is a no go.  Apple has a choke hold on the market that's almost painful to watch and the whole reason is that got their foot in to the door first and now if you have tons of iTunes purchases you're probably going to be stuck and even if all music was non-DRM most people still don't understand and most devices don't play back AAC(is that correct... been out of the loop for a little while).  I think someone from Gizmondo said it best on a tech interview I watched about ZuneHD... "What most people will ask when they see it is 'can I use iTunes with this?' the answer is no and so they'll never get it"

I'm not trying to find excuses nor workarounds, I'm trying to assess the situation as fairly as i can for my limited experience, even though I despise some of Apple's policy as much as MS's when it comes to so-called "integration".

As for the DRM and iTunes: check again, you can buy 100% of the music in both DRM-encumbered or DRM-free formats. I guess your GF downloaded the DRM-encumbered one, that I get is cheaper and comes in a lower quality encoding, but obviously with no guarantee of use save in Apple-approved ways. iTunes will even convert the DRM-free tunes to MP3 if you want, so that you can play them anywhere, including your Zune.

As for plugging your GF's iPod to your 360, straight from support.microsoft.com: "To play unprotected advanced audio coding (AAC) music from an Apple iPod, use your Xbox LIVE Silver or Gold Membership to download a free update from the Xbox LIVE Marketplace." The PS3 will see the iPod as a USB device and play AAC files, as well.

 

Windows comes preinstalled and set up into 99% of the computers sold to final users, with most of the times no option to have a preinstalled and set up alternative OS. Thus the choice offered to the final user is either accept the offer and expertise from the seller, or jump on their own into the depths of an OS install, a daunting task for your average user. That's not a fair competition from the start go.

On the other hand people have to download and install iTunes on their computer, and in the same way they can choose to download and install different programs to manage their library and/or connect to a music selling service. I can't see how iTunes is at a fault here.



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman