http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/prototype-review

Closing comments...

"Prototype isn't really a game of exploration though. It's also less visually striking and varied than last month's inFamous, and less stylish than Crackdown. But, again, neither is really a criticism. Prototype is a game of riotous, gore-splattering ultraviolence. That's all it wants to be, and in many respects it does a solid, and often spectacular job. The victims may be plot, atmosphere and the difficulty curve, but then great power always comes at a cost."

7/10

I hate not checking the title before i post the thread

Anyway, better review than IGNs, who'd have guessed a 7?

I certainly wouldn't bet, but if you said it was different than the average, it had to be something lower (as we have seen near-10 scores). and I don't think it's very surprising coming from Eurogamer. and they are complaining about the difficulty... bah

so we have 2 AAA & 2 average reviews now

It'll probably be in the 80's which is a good thing.

Umm. IGN gave it a 7.5 (US) and AU gave it 8.5. How is it better?

Who are you responding to?

No that's pretty much what I expected. I fully expect it to be one of those types of games that scores around the 70's but ends up being more fun then most games cored in the 90s.

Considering how hard Eurogamer is I expected a 6 kind of.

Carl2291 said: I hate not checking the title before i post the thread Anyway, better review than IGNs, who'd have guessed a 7?

I'm responding to this. The sentence is vague though, is he saying the review is better or the score from the review is better?

@ axumblade

Visually striking and variation are just a couple of things infamous did better than prototype.

If they got the same score, there must be other areas where prototype was better than infamous.
They never said Infamous was a better game.