Theres Grand Slam Tennis and Virtua Tennis coming this month on the Wii. I really don't plan on buying both so I looked for reviewers help.
IGN 8.5/10
"Grand Slam Tennis is an impressive package on Wii, and one of the best tennis games I’ve ever played. ..... On top of some impressive, extremely accurate – once you get the feel for them – motion controls the game is also packed with content, including a full Grand Slam career mode, create-a-character, impressive online play that puts country vs. country play at the forefront of it all, and a party mode I actually want to play."
Eurogamer 5/10
"Grand Slam Tennis is an underwhelming representation of tennis, crippled by unintuitive controls, and just makes you want to go back to the precision of Top Spin or Virtua Tennis on a control pad."
Seriously, one of this 2 reviewers need to be shot. How can the game be best for 1 and worst for the other ? Ok they may give a bit different scores but from 5 to 8.5 the difference is bigger than the sky.
This isn't a discussion about any of the 2 games or any console, it's about how can games can get so different scores.








