^ I agree

 Aren't you being overly defensive of Sony?

Give them a chance?

1. First they fought Immersion in the courts preventing them from putting dual shock in the PS3 controller.

2. Second, they made after the fact excuses for why rumble suddenly doesn't matter this generation instead of just admitting to not being able to legally do so and Sony fans like you ate it up convincing yourselves rumble never mattered to you either.

3. Third, they lost the case anyway and had to pay 90 million dollars as oppossed to the 13 million that Microsoft only had to for settling the matter civily out of court. 

4. Now finally, in the end, after having payed 90 million dollars in a long and ugly lawsuit which forced them to launch the PS3 without rumble, they finally release rumble controllers but only after having already convinced all thier loyal supporters that they don't want rumble anyway. And to add insult to injury, it's not even updated rumble, its exactly the same as the criticized Dualshock 2.

If these are not actions warranting criticism and citing, then what are?  

Regular rumble will do fine, thank you.

 This is the only differnce from PS2 rumble and PS3 rumble.  Immersion altered the frequency seetings with filters so that the vibration won't generate 'motion' that will be detected by the motion sensing accelerometers in the PS3 controller.

Basically the same way the Wii cotnroller handles rumble and motion sensing at the same time.    

Onimusha12 said:

Aren't you being overly defensive of Sony?

Give them a chance?

1. First they fought Immersion in the courts preventing them from putting dual shock in the PS3 controller.

2. Second, they made after the fact excuses for why rumble suddenly doesn't matter this generation instead of just admitting to not being able to legally do so and Sony fans like you ate it up convincing yourselves rumble never mattered to you either.

3. Third, they lost the case anyway and had to pay 90 million dollars as oppossed to the 13 million that Microsoft only had to for settling the matter civily out of court.

4. Now finally, in the end, after having payed 90 million dollars in a long and ugly lawsuit which forced them to launch the PS3 without rumble, they finally release rumble controllers but only after having already convinced all thier loyal supporters that they don't want rumble anyway. And to add insult to injury, it's not even updated rumble, its exactly the same as the criticized Dualshock 2.

If these are not actions warranting criticism and citing, then what are?

True story.

It's getting harder and harder to defend Sony's statements these days.