Well thats a fact I thought everyone, even most blind fanboys has realized...
I think 2010-2011 will be end of Xbox 360.

I don't see that this is stupid thread.Most people who just won't admit it go "saying troll thread" and all that.
Justify your point if you don't agree.

The point was proved 9 pages ago yet still it runs.  How about you make yourself look like an ass too by explaining why you think the 360 is near the end too.  E3 is going to be hilarious this year.

I don't feel like doing a bunch of pointless quoting really. Yes there are people such as yourself that have proved the OP wrong and I'm in complete agreance with you and others using logic like yours. I'm a PS3 fanboy somewhat myself but I don't let arrogance blind my own views in what is fact or universal agreement.

I should had specified some of the randoms coming in here and posting nothing other than PS3 flame comments or crazy agrements with the OP without any real proof. For that I apologize on the broad generalization.

In the end none of the big 3 are close to dying and we will see the next console coming from all 3 next gen.

No, it's not the end of the Xbox 360.

I love how your Logic fails to see that the XBox 360 has three prices....and I love how all you Ps3 fans always pit the arcade against the ps3.....

MS has a different Stratergy from Sony.....So in any event Sony's strategy is just taking off...

Until you can prove that Arcade unit is the only one selling don't use such failed comparison..

By the way....Infinity Ward just reported 17 Million unique CoD4 users on Xbox Live...Subtract 17 million from 28 million and you get the number of people with a Hard Drive in their 360 and Xbox Live Gold...Then Factor in the varible of 360 owners with Hard Drives that have not played CoD4.....your comparison = FAIL!

This Thread = Fail and the PS3 exclusive Line up has yet to prove it will push the ps3 over Xbox 360 in weekly sales...as it yet to do so!

See the stuff in RED do the Math!

I dont get it...........

360 > PS3 in weekly sales without america = 360 doomed

LOL @ spin.

Sure u could bring in the price gap factor, but its a excuse and MS can easily drop some more if PS3 chooses to do so.

I didn't "misleaded" anyone. Entry level price is 199. PS3 won't reach that anytime soon. As for the "value" thing, it's a talking point. I was just mentioning it, because I knew you would take it seriously. I, personally, don't.

The 360 arcade, according to MS, isn' the top selling sku. However, price isn't nearly as important as BRAND. Because if it was, the Gamecube would have destroyed the PS2, and the 360 would destory the PS3. Neither happened. The PS3s sales are largely due to the currently poor Playstation BRAND. The console needs a redesign, and a reintroduction to AMERICA. You think the PS3 will be a success this gen, based on its current performance?

Also, the PS3 isn't a "gaming machine" at 399. It is a multimedia device. You hpay 199 for the blu-ray player, by itself, if you want it or not. Over half of the consoles price is due to its multimedia functionality, which was completely unnecessary for gaming(we have hard-drives now crazzy, and can install our games, space isn't an issue, in fact, many games don't even use Blu-Ray, instead opting to require you to install them to the HD for better/quicker gameplay)

As for Killzone 2, that game wasn't a hardware mover. Aren't both consoles selling poorly? Are they down year over year?

As for the numbers you presented, you presented them, not me. It is not my job to determine their margin for error. You should have mentioned that in your OP if you didn't want me correcting your incorrect statements.

The PS3 needs a price cut. While 10k might not seem that big to you, in reality, that is 10 percent, and in business, 10 percent is pretty big. If PS3 sales increased 10 percent, it would match the 360. Then you might have a point.

299 PS3 will sell more than the 360, for a while. That is what a price cut does. Just like the 199 360 "destroyed" the PS3. Consoles can make comebacks. Things change. If they didn't, the PS3 would be finished. Thing is, right now, the 199 360 is real, the 299 PS3 is theory. That said, I doubt a 299 PS3 will be the epic storm of PS3 sales you think it will(in the long term). They could eventually end up in second place with a price cut soon, but they are cutting that possibility close. Bar is sat rather low, no?

Your argument is simplistic. Price is not the only, or the most important factor in videogame sales. The PS3 taught us that. The reason price is so important to the PS3 is three fold.

A. It has a "too expensive" stigma over its brand.

B. The economy has people scared to spend money.

C. The console costs too much for the mass market in general.

I'm not saying that a price cut isn't welcome. In fact, it is needed. It is 8 MILLION units behind a failure ridden second place console. A price cut is ABSOLUTELY NEEDED.

However, no price cut will "destory the 360." That is an ignorant and simplistic statement with a completely flawed logic. I don't know if you realized that or not.

well 360 owners actually buy games