By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - KH handheld games without final fantasy characters! :(

blaydcor on 24 May 2009
theprof00 said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
theprof00 said:
the main character is not a disney character. Therefore it makes sense to include some final fantasy in the game at least simply to keep the theme going and not make it feel like they are really out of place.

But I agree, they are not so needed as the disney characters.


On the flipside, the main character isn't a Final Fantasy character either.

No final fantasy character has ever had a reprisal protagonist role. They are also from the FF dimension, as explained in the game.

What about Vaan, he is the protaganist of two FF's.

On topic, I don't really give a damn. The FF characters usually have little to no role and aren't always 100% faithful to their original incarnations anyway. Disney worlds + the Kingdom Hearts original characters are the two most important elements.



Crusty VGchartz old timer who sporadically returns & posts. Let's debate nebulous shit and expand our perpectives. Or whatever.

Around the Network
Munkeh111 on 24 May 2009

They need a Sephiroth boss fight in BBS... anyway, however few FF characters there are in BBS, it is still going to be a great game, and they better get their act together and get it done



Dgc1808 on 24 May 2009
naznatips said:
Harkins1721 said:
ClaudeLv250 said:
Actually, Disney owns all the original characters...so yeah, the main character is a Disney character. Just not one from any movie.


False.

Disney does not own Sora. Sora is made by Nomura and Nomura is working with Square Enix. So really Nomura has control over Sora.

People talk too much without knowing what they are talking about.

http://na.square-enix.com/games/kingdomhearts/

© Disney. Developed by SQUARE ENIX.
SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd.

Okay kids, today's lesson is in trademarks. The primary holding for the game "Kingdom Hearts" is Disney. Hence the listing of their trademark. SE gets credit for the development, but the only trademark they are claiming is their logo. Square Enix has absolutely zero rights to Kingdom Hearts. It's completely Disney's game. Need more proof? Disney already made a Kingdom Hearts game without SE.

http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html

Just because I'm an ass, another link listing Sora and the other characters as Disney characters.

http://www.digitalmediafx.com/E3/disneysquare.html

Overkill I know, but I have to live up to the avatar.

 



OT: Doesn't matter to me one bit...

The FF characters to me were just a bonus, not a necessity.



4 ≈ One

Simulacrum on 24 May 2009

WHAAAT...
COME ON!!



 

 

Take my love, take my land..

theprof00 on 24 May 2009

whatever this is bullshit damage control.



Around the Network
pastro243 on 24 May 2009

I prefer FF characters to disney, but I dont care a lot, KH only needs sora, kairi, riku, donald, goofy and mickey, leaving all other disney characters aside and its still a great game.

i think the game needed FF characters and disney to become popular, but now it has its fanbase. I was interested in KH because of FF at first but now for me its as great as the other games.



- Our album on spotify https://open.spotify.com/album/56mEbEgyBYGzcDyZ1eMQ1v?si=hYKgir5YRSCrzywgGmV4oQ

- Our videoclip 

- My manga: https://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/blanca-the-world/list?title_no=313068

Khuutra on 24 May 2009
theprof00 said:
whatever this is bullshit damage control.

Your entire original point was dependent on Sora being a Square character. How is that bullshit?



sc94597 on 24 May 2009

Like others have said, I don't see how this affects the game. Imo the Final Fantasy characters are fan service and nothing else. The Disney movie characters actually have something to do with the story. Imo though the best characters are the new ones created to fit the game and its gameplay.



MaxwellGT2000 on 24 May 2009
blaydcor said:
theprof00 said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
theprof00 said:
the main character is not a disney character. Therefore it makes sense to include some final fantasy in the game at least simply to keep the theme going and not make it feel like they are really out of place.

But I agree, they are not so needed as the disney characters.


On the flipside, the main character isn't a Final Fantasy character either.

No final fantasy character has ever had a reprisal protagonist role. They are also from the FF dimension, as explained in the game.

What about Vaan, he is the protaganist of two FF's.

On topic, I don't really give a damn. The FF characters usually have little to no role and aren't always 100% faithful to their original incarnations anyway. Disney worlds + the Kingdom Hearts original characters are the two most important elements.

Don't forget FFIV the after years with Cecil!

OT:  I'm getting 358/2 days for the gameplay and having a Kingdom Hearts game portable that's better than Chain of Memories :P

Plus it might be able to hold me over until Kingdom Hearts 3 which has to be a ways off -_-



MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"

Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000

Hisiru on 24 May 2009
darksquall2 said:
''There will be no Final Fantasy characters present in 358/2 Days apart from Moogles, who will manage shops for the Organization'' wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_Hearts_358/2_Days

and for birth by sleep they don't even mention final fantasy characters

Is Square characters + Disney characters, and not Final Fantasy characters + Disney characters. They don't announced all the characters for both versions, even the DS version that is almost in the stores has a lot of secrets (we know about a bunch of playable characters, but if you see in certain videos, Donald and Goofy will be playable, but Square don't announced these characters like playable characters), we have to wait.