Well I'm afraid you didn't get it right, try again.

and while you're at it try readin teh whole arguement and not make shit up yeah?

 What sh*t did I make up? 

I actually agree with your arguement, I just find the fact that you called somebody so biased you couldn't talk to them slightly amusing, considering the circumstances...

Wolverine is a movie liscensed game, that was your first mistake.....

You cannot compare the predestined failure of a liscensenced franchise to a game that has peaked the interest in favor of it in many, given excedingly high marks from other reviewers, praised by early players(who got it weeks before release) and those who also liked the demo(me).

And how about reading the different reviews. You will see Eurogamer took everything that every other reviewer(the IGNs, Joystick, etc) loved about the game and turned it into a negative. Right off the bat they relate Infamous to a shooter...which it is not. They complain about some missions repeating......which is funny, I thought all sanbox games did that.Yet other BETTER reviewers have stated there is much variety. To have these views completely contradict what I have seen and heard from other reviewers makes me question how the hell they could feel that way without being blatently biased. At least in the 8.5 reviews they didn't try to morph every positive into a negative.

I trully think they do this to PS3 games to get hits from a lot of angry fans on their site. Some attention is better then no attention.

Exactly how am I biased? I didn't say the game was shit, I didn't say it was a 7 or a 9. I do plan on buying this game one day when I get my PS3.

Since 360 fans started claiming their library superior because it has a few more titles ranked +90

I said you don't own a PS3 - check
I said you have no interest in this game - apparently I'm wrong, but I'd never seen you express interest before
You've read the reviews - seems in this thread if you've read any, its just the one that got the lowest score

forevercloud has played the demo - check
he's read the reviews - check
he's getting the game - check

So apparently I "made up sh*t" that you are interested in buying the game, and that's why you came in this thread.  Though it seems odd that you never once posted in the "official" thread where many positive reviews are posted, and instead chose to come into the one thread with a below-average score and defend the review. 

You're right, you're clearly on the up and up, my bad.

I see you forgot that:

Eurogamer review for Uncharted: Drake's Fortune is 9.0, when other sites like GameSpot and Playstation: The Official Magazine gave it 8.0. May be Uncharted is on the wrong system too?

Also LittleBigPlanet - 95, Resistance 2 - 90.

Stop this BS pls, Eurogamer is harsh to games. We all know that, but they are harsh to games on all platforms.

^This

@ Seece

Wow! Aint that just the pot calling the ketle....

I have played the game, researched it, pretty much all but played the full game yet so my opinion on it holds much more bearing then anything YOU could say about it.

Demos are a jist of what the game will be like. I have put in about 10hrs into the DEMO. Do you have any idea how outrageously fun it is? No, you couldn't .....you haven't played it. The Demo offers majority of the entire first island to play with as well as about 5 missions to contend with. Those FIVE missions are so different in execution that they alone offer more variety then most sandbox games such as GTA.The pop in was not that noticable at all in the demo(only thing that made me pay attention to it was the fact early reviews pointed them out) this is only further enforced by IGN's reviews which say the pop in is no biggy.

Eurogamer also pokes at the mechanics of the game. I find this the most biased because every other person who has played it praises it on this very fact. The cover system is solid, the aiming is on point, the enemies are challenging and fresh. All this can be seen from the Demo. So yea, I do KNOW this game is of much higher quality then Eurogamer would have us believe.

So run along and talk about something where your opinion has basis you obvious little fanboy.

Exactly what have I said about it though forever? I didn't rate it or call it shit. I didn't even say it was a 7. I said none of you could possibly know until you play the full game, and even then your opinion is going to be biased.

See you just see a 360 fan and instantly think "HE'S ATTACKING OMG BRING OUT THE GUNZ"

Dear god ...

no, Eurogamer is not "Harsh". They simply give games the score that will net them the most attention. They seem to ALWAYS be in the minority of what a game's score is(frequently when it comes to PS3 games) to most reviewers. Only thing is, Every once in a while they like to give an appropriate score, ya know why? Because viewers are just as astonished to see them give a positive score(or at least one that makes sense) to a game, for so often it is not the case!