By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Cage: Heavy Rain not possible on Xbox 360

Zizzla_Rachet on 17 May 2009
dcIKeeL said:
@zizzla rachet

"Sure why not....But that does not mean a thing when speaking about how long PS3 exclusive have been In development.........

And As for Heavy Rain.......I know this is the Oldest video...But...LOL....If the 360 Can't do that..Then PS3 deserves to win the Console war..."


So i suppose the Xbox 1 won last generation, seeing as it was head and shoulders superior to the ps3 in graphics power? I don't agree with this at all but am just stating to show how bias and fanboyish your statement is. Sure you meant it all "tongue and cheek" but I know you didnt otherwise you wouldnt have taken the time to type it, seeing as tongue and cheek is really a personal face to face kinda joke, and when done on a medium like the internet, it really just means that u meant your statement.

You're taking your "perceived" notion that the ps3 is so superior to the 360 in graphical power and running with it, even going so far as deeming this the deciding and virtually only factor in declaring a console better overall than another. It's the same logic Killzone losers apply when they say: "killzone 2 is the best looking console game ever, therefore its the best shooter ever!!"

When really it's not. It may be the best looking console game out there so far but it is not the best shooter, at all. COD 4 is still generally regarded as a much more enjoyable and intense game, Gears is a better campaign and multiplayer than killzone 2 among potential others...sooo shhhhhhh

Why would I suppose That the Xbox was Head And Shoulders over PS3? I'm a total 360 fanboy...Just read My post history... What are you talking about.....?

 



Around the Network
Carl on 17 May 2009

I cant belive i almost posted this...

How the hell did such a random topic get 300+ comments? O.o



                            

Akvod on 17 May 2009
dcIKeeL said:
@zizzla rachet

"Sure why not....But that does not mean a thing when speaking about how long PS3 exclusive have been In development.........

And As for Heavy Rain.......I know this is the Oldest video...But...LOL....If the 360 Can't do that..Then PS3 deserves to win the Console war..."


So i suppose the Xbox 1 won last generation, seeing as it was head and shoulders superior to the ps3 in graphics power? I don't agree with this at all but am just stating to show how bias and fanboyish your statement is. Sure you meant it all "tongue and cheek" but I know you didnt otherwise you wouldnt have taken the time to type it, seeing as tongue and cheek is really a personal face to face kinda joke, and when done on a medium like the internet, it really just means that u meant your statement.

You're taking your "perceived" notion that the ps3 is so superior to the 360 in graphical power and running with it, even going so far as deeming this the deciding and virtually only factor in declaring a console better overall than another. It's the same logic Killzone losers apply when they say: "killzone 2 is the best looking console game ever, therefore its the best shooter ever!!"

When really it's not. It may be the best looking console game out there so far but it is not the best shooter, at all. COD 4 is still generally regarded as a much more enjoyable and intense game, Gears is a better campaign and multiplayer than killzone 2 among potential others...sooo shhhhhhh

Dude he's arguing against the PS3... Anyway as for your post, yes the only way to win a console war is to sell more consoles. However people can still hold an opinion on which console is a better one, which isn't based on sales.

Gameplay is purely subjective. Graphics are more objective to judge. While I do agree, if a PS3 fanboy literally said "killzone 2 is the best looking console game ever, therefore its the best shooter ever!!" they'll be wrong. However I don't think it's wrong if they say "Not only is Killzone 2 the best looking game, but it has absolutely amazing gameplay to match its graphical superioty" then they're not wrong, or at least not as wrong as you saying"When really it's not. It may be the best looking console game out there so far but it is not the best shooter, at all. COD 4 is still generally regarded as a much more enjoyable and intense game, Gears is a better campaign and multiplayer than killzone 2 among potential others...sooo shhhhhhh"

It's as subjective of an opinion as your own extremely confident (to the point that it sounds like you feel your opinion is fact) opinion.

 



Staude on 17 May 2009
Carl2291 said:
I cant belive i almost posted this...

How the hell did such a random topic get 300+ comments? O.o

 

Idunno.. lots of people who wanted to argue i guess XD

 

I had no idea it'd get this big either lol :p



Check out my game about moles ^

dahuman on 17 May 2009

this is starting to turn into the worst thread ever ^^;;;;



Around the Network
Staude on 17 May 2009

na. It's not the best but i've seen worse :p



Check out my game about moles ^

slowmo on 17 May 2009

Who ever commented on UE not producing nice games other than Gears and LAst REmenant wants their eyes testing. I assume they never played Bioshock which was also based on UE, although modified to their needs like any good dev could do.



dahuman on 17 May 2009

turning into, not quiet there yet fortunately, these debates are annoying, a lot of times I have to skip posts. 360 has free AA and a better upscaler, PS3 has more power, that's pretty much what it comes down to, and uncharted uses a different way to animate vs something more traditional like assassin's creed, it's a little more dynamic, whether it can be done on the 360 or not, I have no idea, don't think anybody has tried on 360, but I don't think they've perfected the way uncharted animation works yet, we'll see with 2. ACreed is one impressive game on PC though, I just found out there was a PC version last week and I sold the console copy right away and started playing it on PC again and man..... just wow, but that's PC lol. Ubisoft rarely fail to impress me unless it's a Wii game, sometimes DS.



Staude on 18 May 2009
dahuman said:
turning into, not quiet there yet fortunately, these debates are annoying, a lot of times I have to skip posts. 360 has free AA and a better upscaler, PS3 has more power, that's pretty much what it comes down to, and uncharted uses a different way to animate vs something more traditional like assassin's creed, it's a little more dynamic, whether it can be done on the 360 or not, I have no idea, don't think anybody has tried on 360, but I don't think they've perfected the way uncharted animation works yet, we'll see with 2. ACreed is one impressive game on PC though, I just found out there was a PC version last week and I sold the console copy right away and started playing it on PC again and man..... just wow, but that's PC lol. Ubisoft rarely fail to impress me unless it's a Wii game, sometimes DS.

Yea i'm hoping for them to announce a dark messiah of might and magic 2 :p

 



Check out my game about moles ^

headshot91 on 18 May 2009
dcIKeeL said:
headshot91 said:
dcIKeeL said:
headshot91 said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
dcIKeeL said:
twingo said:
360 cant run the same amount of physics PS3 can, it cant have worlds as big/detailed.

 

 I'm soooo tired of this nonsense!! Do you sony drones truly believe that in the same generation 1 particular system is so advanced that whole games can't be replicated on the competition? Especially since the core technology for both systems is the SAME because, gee idk, they were developed by the SAME GUY!!?!?

Besides, last gen, all you sony fanboys were so quick to dismiss graphical prowess when the sony platform was clearly inferior, as opposed to now, where all people hear is, "wait until blank game and you'll see the true power of ps3 and its cell". The truth is graphics are nice, but they dont make the game, they compliment it. and like aussiegecko said: "its just a marketing gib".

Which ever system is graphically superior is only slightly superior, not 1-2 generations superior. BTW, when looking at pure specs, 360 slightly edges ps3...sooo quit the trolling u tarts

And yet ps3 game stand out more in graphic department such as Uncharted 1 and 2 KZ2 GT5 MGS4 and heavyrain.

 

First of all i think twingo is right about the physics area, ps3 is more avanced in that respect than the 360. no need to call him a sony drone.

You are misguided when looking at pure specs as apart from being , i think, quite subjective, on the technical aspects anyway, when looking at what you get in the actual console e.g. wifi, blu ray player, internet etc, the ps3 trumps the 360 in that repect. PLus the 7 spe's do mean that ps3 is better than the 360 for physics programs. You stop trolling eh?

 

You sir, are retarded. Where does this come from: when looking at what you get in the actual console e.g. wifi, blu ray player, internet etc, the ps3 trumps the 360 in that repect. PLus the 7 spe's do mean that ps3 is better than the 360 for physics programs. Whose talking about console value?? My comment and this thread is strictly about graphical power, and when i say specs i mean the 360's and ps3's respective technological specifications, as in bandwith, memory distribution, processing power, etc...understand? And having more spe's does not  deem it superior, as whats more important than the number of units, is each units efficiency at doing what they do and they're respective limitations and overall limits when looked at as a whole. I understand you'd jump of a bridge for some company who doesnt give 2 tarts what u want and therefore felt the need to state a completely irrelevant comment (which i agree with) about console value in order to gain what u perceived to be an upperhand, but guess what? You, heard about trolling, yes, no? Look it up, ur it!

 

ok, lets deal with this in order.

Just quoting you for a min here :

Word of advice, grow up and be objective to everything, argue with logic not emotion and personal preference, 

Your post automatically fails by your rules, as you have insulted me, and argued using emotive words.

Secondly, I was saying about technological aspects that people can pull numbers out of anywhere, but it seems that overall the ps3 is more powerful than the 360.

Thirdly, I don't know ehere you got the "having more spe's does not deem it superior" bit from, as when talking about TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS e.g. physics, the more spe's make the ps3 more than capable of beating the 360 in that respect, so that argument fails. Just talk to ghostbusters dev team for example. 

Also, I don't know where you come from with your primitive ideas, but I would never "jump off a bridge" for any company, your ideas are just absurd, nasty and confrontational.

I couldn't stop you from forming any subjective opinion over the tech specs of either consoles, so I just put a point in, its more relevant than calling people tarts.

Look up the meaning  of a rational arguement and come back to me eh?

 

 

 awww, we've got a special little one dont we. I can choose to spew my emotions whenever i want as long as they don't interfere with my argument and cloud my judgement. My argument is sound, and it isnt poisoned by any emotion, when i call people tarts and retards and use, jump of a bridge references it is simply to put my opinion of you into perspective. My opinions can be whatever they want and sadly mines and anyone elses are non negotiable so they cannot be called an argument. BTW,just because you aren't using emotive words and tones in your arguments doesnt mean they arent being fueled by emotion. I know you are not as stupid as your arguments make you seem and i;m reasoning that your emotions and personal preferences are clouding your judgement or you're simply choosing to ignore facts. You can like whatever you want, but when you start arguing facts leave your feelings at the door.

I still dont see why you included console value into your argument, since it wasn't a point I or anyone else was contending and didn't compliment the argument of the ps3 being more graphically advanced than the 360 or not. You're simply saying it seems that overall the ps3 is more powerful than the 360. Really headshot, why does it seem that way, hmmm???

Man, you don't understand how to arggue properly so I'm just going to almost ignore the first paragraph. I never said your opinions cant be whatever they want, they can, but to imply im so rabid fanboy is an insult and not right. Oh and btw apart from the console value thing (which i only put in there because i thought people could argue over that instead of throwing numbers round, and no 1 else has commented on that apart from you, you havent actually touched my actual points, is it because theyre right by any chance? And yes it seems that way because thats what I said, eh?