By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Cage: Heavy Rain not possible on Xbox 360

Garnett said:
@CGIQuality
Lets see R2 came out in 11/4/2008..
You said that 12/28/08
A month after it came out you said that,You were rooting for R2 all along...Nothing wrong with favoring a system i favor the 360,but give credit where credit is due dude in the games section,360 has more games rated 80+.
CGI-Quality said "Agreed. Resistance has the better shadows - as far as textures, it's tough but to me right now Gears may have the edge with textures but as far as overall scope Resistance 2 looks like the best lookin..."

 

 

Accept that ps3 has a better processor :p

 



Check out my game about moles ^

Around the Network
coolbeans said:
Sigh, unless they actually tested it on the 360 to see if it would work I'm just gonna say I'll let him "think" all he wants to.

 

actually, out of all the people making this claim, Cage would know best. Heavy Rain was originally slated as a MP release. Yet due to production issues(development and funding) they went PS3 exclusive. So yes, Heavy Rain was too much for the 360......



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

@Staude Way to go off subject, but I want to see games that are really 2x as good as 360 games then ill admit,but graphically iv seen NO game on 360 match KZ2,the only game to match R2 fun is L4D.

 

@CGI waiting for it,just say "360 has more games 80+ than Playstation 3" and ill drop it,just admit it.


Ok the R2 thing was off my bad,So CGI how does the public determine quality? If sales and average reviews dont mean squat.

 

 

 



sorry to rain in like this, but just for thought..........ps3 in its 3rd year and 360 in its 4rth year..........HOW COME WE HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING LIKE HEAVY RAIN ON 360? in grafix technical dept?



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

rckrz6 said:
Staude said:
rckrz6 said:
I don't need to try, the ps3 and xbox have similiar processing power

 

Actually the cell is a more powerful processor and it specifies in some things where it completely violates the 360... and those are the areas they've made use off. Like in flower.

 

Not to say the 360s processor is bad at all. It's not.. But they work completely different.

 

and xenos is better then the rsx.. what xbox loses in cpu power is made up in gpu power.  The rsx bottlenecks the ps3 terribly.   In overall perfomance, anyone who builds computers knows that having a better gpu yeields way  better results then buying a medicore gpu with a top notch cpu.  Its all about where your bottle neck is.  Your only as fast as your slowest componnent

You mean people who build computers out of comodity x86 hardware for best buy. The high performance computing crowd tend not to agree with you.

Also if you are only as fast as your slowest component, then maybe we should all start hacking the usb controllers off our mother boards.

 



Around the Network

@Sheekuk

 

Because 360 isnt maxed out yet...

 

 



Garnett said:

@Staude Way to go off subject, but I want to see games that are really 2x as good as 360 games then ill admit,but graphically iv seen NO game on 360 match KZ2,the only game to match R2 fun is L4D.

 

@CGI waiting for it,just say "360 has more games 80+ than Playstation 3" and ill drop it,just admit it.


Ok the R2 thing was off my bad,So CGI how does the public determine quality? If sales and average reviews dont mean squat.

 

 

 

 

What does 2 times the look have to do with it ? What you see isn't always what you get.

 

In other words it's also about the AI and things happening along with various other subtle but present things.

 

Anyways killzone 2s rendering system is great. Looks sort of like skylight running in realtime but better.



Check out my game about moles ^

@CGI Quality

 

Where did you admit 360 has more 80+ games? Link it up!

Sales + Reviews = Quality.

 

Not not most of the public but those wanting to buy games who know of metacritic or gamespot or ANY review site looks them up.

 

 



alephnull said:
rckrz6 said:
Staude said:
rckrz6 said:
I don't need to try, the ps3 and xbox have similiar processing power

 

Actually the cell is a more powerful processor and it specifies in some things where it completely violates the 360... and those are the areas they've made use off. Like in flower.

 

Not to say the 360s processor is bad at all. It's not.. But they work completely different.

 

and xenos is better then the rsx.. what xbox loses in cpu power is made up in gpu power.  The rsx bottlenecks the ps3 terribly.   In overall perfomance, anyone who builds computers knows that having a better gpu yeields way  better results then buying a medicore gpu with a top notch cpu.  Its all about where your bottle neck is.  Your only as fast as your slowest componnent

You mean people who build computers out of comodity x86 hardware for best buy. The high performance computing crowd tend not to agree with you.

Also if you are only as fast as your slowest component, then maybe we should all start hacking the usb controllers off our mother boards.

 

games aren't running off your usb controller. you said that out of spite

        a 9500gt running with a i7 will run a slower framte rate then a 9800gt running with a core2.   ive been building gamming machines since pentium 2.   Why?  because video cards do a good majority of the work.   If your talking about pure processoring power outside of gamming then your not on the same page as me

 



Skeeuk said:
sorry to rain in like this, but just for thought..........ps3 in its 3rd year and 360 in its 4rth year..........HOW COME WE HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING LIKE HEAVY RAIN ON 360? in grafix technical dept?