alephnull said:
rckrz6 said:
Staude said:
rckrz6 said:
I don't need to try, the ps3 and xbox have similiar processing power |
Actually the cell is a more powerful processor and it specifies in some things where it completely violates the 360... and those are the areas they've made use off. Like in flower.
Not to say the 360s processor is bad at all. It's not.. But they work completely different.
|
and xenos is better then the rsx.. what xbox loses in cpu power is made up in gpu power. The rsx bottlenecks the ps3 terribly. In overall perfomance, anyone who builds computers knows that having a better gpu yeields way better results then buying a medicore gpu with a top notch cpu. Its all about where your bottle neck is. Your only as fast as your slowest componnent
|
You mean people who build computers out of comodity x86 hardware for best buy. The high performance computing crowd tend not to agree with you.
Also if you are only as fast as your slowest component, then maybe we should all start hacking the usb controllers off our mother boards.
|
games aren't running off your usb controller. you said that out of spite
a 9500gt running with a i7 will run a slower framte rate then a 9800gt running with a core2. ive been building gamming machines since pentium 2. Why? because video cards do a good majority of the work. If your talking about pure processoring power outside of gamming then your not on the same page as me
