| infamous8 said: respawn of duty? why |
I consider myself quite good at FPS's. I playthrough all FPS's first time on the hardest setting. Hence Veteran on COD4. At first I loved the game. But very very quickly the game pissed me off. Why? The AI is actually dumb as Sh*t. It is made harder by constant continuation of respawning enemies. Now the problem is that takes away ANY strategy at all. Try this. Sit and constantly sniper enemies in building windows. If you dont make a suicidal run for the building after taking out some, they will always respawn. You can sit in the same place for over an hour and still be shooting enemies in the same window. LOL. It's pathetic to be honest. A cheap way to make the game hard. ( Which it wasnt as I finished it on Veteran first time in less than 9 hours. Totally ruined what would have been an immersive experience.
See a game like Halo 3 does not have respawning enemies. On Legendary the enemy will attempt to take you out with strategy, not constant respawn. How anyone can consider COD4 good AI, or robust SP is beyond me. It's MP is good, but has it's flaws to the competition. It's more successful on PS3 ( Live Halo 3 is top not COD4 for players ) purely I think because PS3's best shooter was COD4 for ages. But R2 and KZ2 are both better games on PS3. People need to stop feeding sh*t games credit. COD4 gets acclaim and a game like Ninja Blade does not. That frustrates me about the review media. I really want to put a review team together and start a company. One which isnt biased to hype.
















