By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Who'd buy a Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire remake on the DS's successor?

Not me. I think the roster of Pokemon in those games is barely decent, not worth to play it again for me




Around the Network
SmokedHostage said:
insomniac17 said:
SmokedHostage said:
DaveD said:
also, my starter would be mudkip for the lulz

 

 I'd start with Treecko personally.

Pshh, you're both wrong. It's all about Torchic!

 

 I hope you enjoy battling Roxanne with a Torchic.

I love it! I actually use a Shroomish for that fight. Every time. I own her too. =)



RSE blow ass.

DPP are much better.

GSC are the best.



SmokedHostage said:
insomniac17 said:
SmokedHostage said:
DaveD said:
also, my starter would be mudkip for the lulz

 

 I'd start with Treecko personally.

Pshh, you're both wrong. It's all about Torchic!

 

 I hope you enjoy battling Roxanne with a Torchic.

 

in platinum i beat the fire guy in 31337 4 with all earthquake with torterra (part grass) lol



"After you win, son, I feel like going for a ride on your bike, haha." ~Doc Louis (Punch Out Wii)

 

 

Fire Red and Leaf green had nostalgia going for it. Not to mention the new stuff was pretty nice. I liked how the elite four gained like 15 levels after you caught mewtwo. Also I find the Ruby and Sapphire had a ton of ugly pokemon. The legondaries were a real letdown, especially. So no I wouldn't buy it.



95% of gamers don't know they are noobs, the 5% who do won't be noobs for long

Check out my kickstarter project: http://kck.st/15CEuUT

Check out my blog: http://www.metropolisgaming.com

Around the Network
zexen_lowe said:
Not me. I think the roster of Pokemon in those games is barely decent, not worth to play it again for me

 Are you willing to say that every Pokemon Treecko-Deoxys are "barely decent"



Pixel Art can be fun.

SmokedHostage said:
ctk495 said:
SmokedHostage said:
leo-j said:
octk495 said:
Not me those games were really,really bad in my opinion.It did not feel like a pokemon game.There are the worst of the bunch.

 

They were sure better than firered and leafgreen

Thank god I'm alone on this..

 

 

Joel.Are you stoned bro?I mean for real leaf green and fire red were remakes but they were still superior to Ruby and Sapphire.

Firered and Leafgreen were garbage compared to Ruby and Sapphire.  I'm sorry, I can't say the other way around.

 EDIT: My name is Joe, not Joel.

 

 

I was talking to Leo-J his real name is Joel lol.



SmokedHostage said:
zexen_lowe said:
Not me. I think the roster of Pokemon in those games is barely decent, not worth to play it again for me

 

 Are you willing to say that every Pokemon Treecko-Deoxys are "barely decent"

No. I think some are great (like Ralts/Kirlia/Gardevoir). Some are bad (like Whismur/Loudred/Exploud). In average, it's barely decent. What's so hard to understand about it?

 




zexen_lowe said:
SmokedHostage said:
zexen_lowe said:
Not me. I think the roster of Pokemon in those games is barely decent, not worth to play it again for me

 

 Are you willing to say that every Pokemon Treecko-Deoxys are "barely decent"

No. I think some are great (like Ralts/Kirlia/Gardevoir). Some are bad (like Whismur/Loudred/Exploud). In average, it's barely decent. What's so hard to understand about it

 

You act like the first 251 are ALL likeable.  There are always going to be Pokemon people like and Pokemon people hate.  Shouldn't suddenly make you want to play the game less.

 



Pixel Art can be fun.

As somebody said, they don't have "the magic", at all. Worst Pokemon games IMO

As much as I'm usually opposed to remakes, these G/S remakes are the only way possible gamefreak could have lured me back into purchasing a new Pokemon game.



Crusty VGchartz old timer who sporadically returns & posts. Let's debate nebulous shit and expand our perpectives. Or whatever.