Aha!But you see, my friend, Microsoft's whole run this gen is a copy cat with their own twist of what Sony did last gen.

The Same can be said about Sony in the past....For Instance Resident Evil is an Example..Tekken is another...Symphony of the Night comes to mind...and many others...The fact is that Sony would do it and no one but Sega Console owners would complain..No that the tables are turned...MS hate is popular...

I think the big issue for this was that it had a set date for the release. Stores had been told the game is coming out this month for these consoles.

A lot of effort and time went to promote Ghostbusters for the Wii, PC and 360.. Those people won't be happy.

Rofl.
Awesome move Sony, well done, very well done.

For people who are still interested on Last Remnant, Try it on good PC. Trust me its that good!

First of all shut your ASS up I didn't come online to read your shit! I thought it was an important topic like Sony will start charging for online use like Microsoft does.... instead I find a grown ass man compaling over something that's been done time and time again by Microsoft How many games sold 30 million copies much less 64 million..... this post is really bad like wipe your ass with it bad. Microsoft has been buying up smaller companies business game exclusives and DLC content for the past 3 years I don't see any rants on that topic. This author would probably call it good business tactics if this were Microsoft's move or better yet would have ignored it all together. But when Sony does it you shit your self 64 MILLION GAMERS GIVEN THE FINGER!!!! OMG BANNANNA SPLIT BOOOGIE WOOGIE !!!!!!!!!..... GOOD F U C K I N G SHIT! Sony made a fool out of you what kind coment is that like Sony needed to do anything to make you look any more foolish. Either get a PS3..... or get your ass back in line..... and wait like everybody else.... Stop your bitching your no body special. If this offends you in any way feel free to report me.

Ah the smell of Double Standards...

This is why we'd be better with either full multiplatform titles or full exclusive titles and nothing in-between. The in-between stuff always affects consumers.

As ever though its amusing to see how if the exclusivity is favorable its fine and dandy (just buy the system I have then) but if its not it's a terrible practice and unfair (why shouldn't I get it, why make me wait, etc).

But you know, everyone buying exclusive DLC, etc. is essentially backing the system - and sometimes you're going to end up on the losing end.

I'm sorry, I was under the impression that Atari was not going to publish or finish the game for that matter and then Sony stepped in, finished the ps3 version and bought the rights.

Atari then sold the rights to the other versions of the game to other devs who are finishing the game.

Sony buying this game has nothing to do with the schedule of the other games. The game was gunna duke nukem forever until Sony came along and at least finished their own game.