| shams said: I'm not dreaming - just quoting what I have read. This from "the-magicbox.com": ... Now, no question that FF is their biggest franchise - and most important. And if this is their new "strategy", wouldn't it also apply to FF? And I doubt its also coming to the Wii, unless its just a scaled down version - meaning both PS3 / 360 versions in development. Both machines are almost identical after all, its not *that* hard to do this. And if they need to release it in 2 or 3 discs for the 360... so what? This isn't even a slight deterrent to development. @re Sony owning 10% of SE: So what? Any company can buy shares in any other company you know - its called an investment. And they usually do it when they see more potential for growth in that company, than they do in theirs. There is a good reason why there are rules in place to stop a company from "secretly" buying so much of a company, that they end up controlling it (which is called a takeover). Sony do NOT control SE. ... SE are not stupid. If they decided to exclusively back the PS3, I think there would be a shareholder revolt - for "profit" reasons. Why target < 20% of the worldwide console market, when you could target, 40% or even 100% of it? |
I do not think that they mean simultaneous releases across multiple platforms. I think they are referring to simultaneous releases across all territories, hence the adjective "worlwide" used just before the word "simultaneous". This would be in stark contrast to their past strategy of releasing everything in Japan first, then everywhere else a year later.
I think that their current "multiplatform" strategy is simply to make games for every platform, not to make one game on multiple platforms. They are working on handheld titles for both the PSP and DS, in addition to games for the Wii, PS3, and 360, the majority of which have always been exclusive to their respective platforms. Last gen, however, they made everything on one platform - the ps2 (aside from FFCC for the GC and FFIX for the 360), so this move to "multiplatform development" makes sense considering the current state of affairs over at SE.









