fuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuck

ITT: Posts that don't deserve an answer because they can't ask questions correctly.

1) Companies are not losing money, how the fuck is that so hard to understand. This is marketing dollars that will be spent anyways, and raise awareness of the game. It would actually be more expensive to put a demo disc on a magazine like they used to make. That money will be spent any ways. Do you even know what losing money is, instead of spending money?You Want your point to win so whatever....I doubt you understood the article and what it's reporting.

2) How the fuck does that affect you as the end user?Can you say that PSN has as Much Content as XBL or that it recieves as much?

3) How the fuck does that make PSN any worse if it's still getting content frequently?If you had read the article you would understand...

4) You're making a big deal out of the .16/GB and going away from PSN service as a whole for the end user (fuck it you don't know how it is because you don't own a PS3). Should I start complaining about multiple discs that I buy for my 360 because MS charges royalties per disc? What does this even mean? You mean for new games? You think Sony does not charge Royalties?

So why the FUCK are you quoting me? I wasn't even FUCKING asking you anyways, so I never wanted your FUCKING answer. FUCK.

I understood the article just fine, I doubt you understand wtf you're trolling on about though. On the last point just google it. I believe Carmack was the one that said it.

And I'm done, fighting with trolls is always a pain.

 Because FUUUCK is a fun word :P

And even a funner action. :D

LMAO...that was the best one.

Are you kidding me? Are you effin' kidding me?! There are Sony fans who actually took this seriously? It was a joke, you ninnies! O_O

Hopefully it is something good. Like IPTV or more zune compatability or BOTH!!!

Thaaank you !

Finally, somebody noticed .

I don't understand why Sony fanboys are so mad about a writer who makes fun of MS.

1.  But the point is the marketing dollars could have been better spent.  And for the Xbox 360 version they still WILL be better spent.  Therefore a PS3 game could potentially have LESS awareness than it otherwise would have because publishers have to factor in bandwidth costs.  There aren't many companies that still routinely put demo's on discs...

2.  Because sooner or later some content somewhere is going to stay off the PSN because of bandwidth fees, it probably already has.  Not to mention paid content is probably going to get a little more expensive to account for the costs in time.

3.  It doesn't make the PSN bad, but it does make it less good due to lower amounts of content and higher prices.

4.  You can argue that this isn't a big deal, but you cannot argue that it is a good thing or even an even thing, as it will certainly have some negative effects.  Feel free to argue how negative they may be.  As for the MS disc thing?  You're correct.  Some developers may slightly downgrade an experience because of excess charges.  Such as RAGE developers making the game two discs with compression instead of three discs without it.  But the instance is FAR lower than it is with the PSN issue, and any GOOD game getting multiple discs will no doubt do so for free in order to keep it on the Xbox 360 (FFXIII for example).