ZenfoldorVGI said:
Reaching, aren't you? I said I didn't like Sony's strategy. I didn't say I would rather watch my movies in SD. Sony made gamers become early adopters which costs us money that casual adopters won't have to pay. We paid for their format, just to own a PS3, because Sony knew we would. If I didn't want to have a Blu-Ray player bundled with my console(which I have to pay for, btw), then I couldn't pick the PS3. If I HAD to have a PS3, I had to be an early adopter of their new movie format, which I had to pay for. It's a simple marketing scheme. Contrary to your beliefs, not everyone "should want" a Blu-Ray machine just because they have an HDTV. Especially if the BR machine is gonna make them pay an extra 200 bucks on top of their already expensive video-game console. I'm don't download games online, and I'm not paying for XBL. I'm not in "fanboy denial." You just failed to grasp my meaning, and you are upset because I don't like the same things you like. Stop posting off topic, lets steer the discussion in a more positive direction. Don't call me a fanboy, btw. |
I see, I inferred too much, sorry. I think Sony has done the right choice in the long term though, as once the economy picks up again, there's going to be a shit load of 720/1080p HD tvs over stocked in Best Buys, waiting to be sold off at a ridiculous price, along with over stocked Bluray players which would have gotten cheaper over time anyways.
The biggest obstacle in Bluray is, as you said the price of Bluray players, disks, and HD tvs. I say that as soon as that is overcomed, which is guarunteed with time, Sony's investment will finally pay off (I don't know what percentage they have in it O.o, so considering that you might be right). I think that the next definition will take a while, due to everything slowing down with the economic recession, and the ridiculous boom the current set of definitions will experience after a economic upturn.