quality of threads has really gone down the crapper lately.
quality of threads has really gone down the crapper lately.
| Hus said: quality of threads has really gone down the crapper lately. |
This above post is the absolute definition of 'Irony'. I need to call webster...
| rocketpig said: Keep laughing, Xbots. In 2009, when Sony releases the PS3: Stephen Hawking Edition that contains an actual black hole within its plastic shell and offers true 4D gaming, you won't be quite so smug. Of course, there's also a small chance that by powering it on, you may destroy the entire Solar System but compromises have to be made to reach a $500 price point. |
No more Sci-fi channel for you young man.
kn said:
This above post is the absolute definition of 'Irony'. I need to call webster... |
I think everyone got a laugh off of this one. Somehow I don't think Hus will understand though
Tag: Hawk - Reluctant Dark Messiah (provided by fkusumot)
But, as I have asked of the original XBox, is it really a win if Microsoft buys it?
Even if MS makes a profit for the rest of the 360's lifetime, it will have to make some $3 billion to make up for what it lost in the first two years.
I do think 360 is likely to beat PS3 in terms of lifetime hardware sales, but I think it's going to be close.
| couchmonkey said: But, as I have asked of the original XBox, is it really a win if Microsoft buys it? Even if MS makes a profit for the rest of the 360's lifetime, it will have to make some $3 billion to make up for what it lost in the first two years. I do think 360 is likely to beat PS3 in terms of lifetime hardware sales, but I think it's going to be close. |
I think you are missing the point. Microsoft is into this whole "world domination" thing. The set-top box or whatever you want to call the "living room home entertainment appliance" is going to happen. The Xbox, while primarily a games machine, is part of that larger picture. Operating systems on PCs, streaming media, web browsers, and so on are all part of this strategy. MS can not afford to cede control of the living room to the likes of Sony, Cisco, or anyone else and I suspect they aren't looking at a $3B loss in the entertainment arena as a loss per se. I think they are looking at it more from a "entrenching themselves" position. Imagine, for a moment, that the PS3 was very successful and was widely adopted as a "living room appliance". Once established it will be hard to dislodge...
I would be willing to bet that Microsoft's would be absolutely thrilled to find themselves in a strong position going into the NEXT gen so they have time to work on and perfect some of the things that will be well defined by the time the next gen comes around.
I dont care what any of you say, I still think the ps3 will end up the winner with the most market share.

| leo-j said: I dont care what any of you say, I still think the ps3 will end up the winner with the most market share. |
Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?
ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all.
"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away"
kn said:
I think you are missing the point. Microsoft is into this whole "world domination" thing. The set-top box or whatever you want to call the "living room home entertainment appliance" is going to happen. The Xbox, while primarily a games machine, is part of that larger picture. Operating systems on PCs, streaming media, web browsers, and so on are all part of this strategy. MS can not afford to cede control of the living room to the likes of Sony, Cisco, or anyone else and I suspect they aren't looking at a $3B loss in the entertainment arena as a loss per se. I think they are looking at it more from a "entrenching themselves" position. Imagine, for a moment, that the PS3 was very successful and was widely adopted as a "living room appliance". Once established it will be hard to dislodge... |
I do get the idea that Microsoft's win condition is "win or disrupt the set-top box market", and by that measure Xbox has done its job, for sure, but now that Sony's set-top box ambitions are going down the crapper, what is the new measure for 360 success?
Ultimately, we may never agree on this because I think the set-top box is a fantasy, and Wii's massive success versus 360 and PS3 is just one more proof. I could be totally wrong, but Nintendo has at least delayed the video game console-derived set-top box for another four years.
| leo-j said: I dont care what any of you say, I still think the ps3 will end up the winner with the most market share. |
When? How? Give us some numerical examples of how it will happen. Then it changes from fanboy speculation to a prediction based on reason.
Here's another little nugget of wisdom for you. I just went through the weekly data back to launch. The PS3 outsold the Xbox 360 in 10 weeks total -- something like 6 weeks recently (around the price cut) and 4 weeks around the Euro Launch. Other than that, they 360 has always outsold the PS3 on a worldwide basis... That's going to most likely continue through the end of the year based on the 360 libary -- or at least they will be equal... That said, again:
Give us your numerical take on how/when the PS3 will catch the 360...