I would rather shake neither, I am a lazy gamer, I like to sit on my ass.

If I had to choose I would go with the Wiimote of course but that is not my point. My point is that the PS3 could do a game like Madworld.

Even if it "worked," it just isn't quite the same.

A controller with added motion is different than a full out remote in its feel.

The PS3/360 are getting Bayonetta. Shut up already! (speaking in general)

My point is that it can perform just fine on the PS3. It won't be as if it is a horrible experience compared to the Wii. Good or bad experience is all up to the gamer who plays it.

Even though it has a cartoonish art style, had it been developed from ground up on the PS3/360, I'm pretty certain it would look better. If nothing for the fact that it would be displayed in HD.

Would it have preformed better sales wise? I'm not too certain, I would imagine the game would appeal more to the 360/PS3 crowd, but those systems are already crowded with some huge new releases. It's hard to say.

I don't think it should have been on the PS3/360 rather than the Wii - but I suspect it would bring in worthwhile additional sales on PSN/Live in addition to it's Wii sales.

Control-wise, the game wouldn't work on the other consoles. And that includes the PS3 with its half-assed motion controller.