By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is MS paying devs to make better 360 versions of multiplats?

mrstickball said:
No. Microsoft instead used money to build a better system for the developer. Since it's easier to produce a high-quality game on, developers can spend more time on making it the superior version.

Look at the cream of the crop PS3 games: They take far longer to make, and are far more costly than 360 games. That tells me that the development environment is preventing games from looking good without more resources being put on the project.

The Sega Saturn was a bit better than the Playstation 1 from an ability standpoint, but the PS1 always saw better looking games - why? Because the Saturn was hard to develop for, and most just used one of the two cores, leaving games looking inferior. Despite that, first-party megagames like Shenmue looked brilliant in their alphas on the Saturn.

 

 This is the words right out of my mouth. Some fanboys will never leard



Long Live SHIO!

Around the Network
Undying said:

i 2nd, 3rd, and 4th this post

 




Can we get basic stupidity into the forum rules as a bannable ofense?

Please?





Current-gen game collection uploaded on the profile, full of win and good games; also most of my PC games. Lucasfilm Games/LucasArts 1982-2008 (Requiescat In Pace).

Honestly, I don't know why this fail of a thread is still even open or why I didn't lock it when I first saw it.

No, MS does not pay devs to make a game better on the 360. Some tools on another forum may think so, but they are in fact idiots and should not be trusted.

/thread