Parasitic said:
Both situations arn't uncommon. "Victims" that hide what they did to make an officer beat them, and officers that beat victims just because they want to.
None of those should be surprising anymore. |
Oh, I agree, neither is uncommon. But the story itself doesn't help anyone decipher which this is. It conveniently leaves out what took place between him exiting his car and him having been tazed and beaten. It only says "he was arrested". A big question mark is left there as to what exactly happened. Without the actual facts as to what happened, it easily changes from a story to a propoganda peice. That's not good journalism, that's sensationalism regardless of how it actually went down. And I'm not saying they didn't beat him just for the fun of it, but the story's intent seems rather obvious when key facts are left out.

You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.












