Killzowned said:
The PS3 and all it has to offer. This thread was created out of jealously.
|
Righto....or maybe the guys just getting out his anger!!like the other xbox guy who was trolling!!
Killzowned said:
The PS3 and all it has to offer. This thread was created out of jealously.
|
Righto....or maybe the guys just getting out his anger!!like the other xbox guy who was trolling!!
| ironman said: ... it's not out yet. |
prologue is and it's running at 1080p 60fps.
| ironman said: Yes, but will the PS3 keep up with that? |
what to do you mean already is, and god of war will also keep maintain the 60fps.
Killzowned said:
The PS3 and all it has to offer. This thread was created out of jealously.
|
Lol ok whatever you say there...
Honestly i highly doubt it.
It was either created as (a.) a joke thread or (b.) a 360 fanboy's veiwpoint of PS3 fanboys.
Either way some of you guys are proving him right....
|
Xbot said:
And remember people, this theard was started by the person which username is XBOT |
Jo21 said:
what to do you mean already is, and god of war will also keep maintain the 60fps. |
hmm interesting, how do you know it's actually running at 60 FPS, thats basically a 60 hrtz cycle wich means it could be running at 56 and you wouldn't notice the difference because your eye's refresh rate is only 55. But reguardless, the PS3 may have better graphics, but due to hardware limitations pixel mapping and refresh rates are not as good as they could be. Like I said though, the casual gamer would't notice it, and the blind fanboy would try oh so hard to refute those facts. I don't feel it really matters though because the PS3 does have bluray ,which at this point is the only reason I would buy a PS3.
ironman said:
hmm interesting, how do you know it's actually running at 60 FPS, thats basically a 60 hrtz cycle wich means it could be running at 56 and you wouldn't notice the difference because your eye's refresh rate is only 55. But reguardless, the PS3 may have better graphics, but due to hardware limitations pixel mapping and refresh rates are not as good as they could be. Like I said though, the casual gamer would't notice it, and the blind fanboy would try oh so hard to refute those facts. I don't feel it really matters though because the PS3 does have bluray ,which at this point is the only reason I wo |
i dont think anyone would notice, PS3 have been capable of getting games at HD 60fps... and 360 first game was burn out paradise and COD 4.
even cherish halo its a 640p game, sadly because 10mb buffer of the 36 gpu its not enough to render a full 720p with antialiasing and HDR FP 16.
its not even FP 16 but FP 10.
and yet have seen FP 16 in games like uncharted.
Jo21 said:
i dont think anyone would notice, PS3 have been capable of getting games at HD 60fps... and 360 first game was burn out paradise and COD 4. even cherish halo its a 640p game, sadly because 10mb buffer of the 36 gpu its not enough to render a full 720p with antialiasing and HDR FP 16. its not even FP 16 but FP 10. and yet have seen FP 16 in games like uncharted. |
you tell him Jo! Prove that you deserve that degree you are working on! ^^


![]()
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)