What you have said perfectly sums up the clusterf--k situation that Capcom could be in and also what they think about Wii. All other companies are prioritising a Wii version of many games and DR2 was certainly a perfect excuse to build an engine. DR1 didn't do that well on 360 so they are just shooting themselves in the foot.

Doesn't mean better sales. Aren't you all forgetting how much games you hate sell on the Wii? Why does this rule magically change when it comes to CTYD?

How about Capcom just isn't marketing it, when even Ubisoft knows even the shovelware sells best with marketing.

Games I hate?  What are you talking about?

I don't mean you. I meant those claiming the game's sales are due to it being bad (without actually qualifying what is supposed to be so bad about it).

Also, where is the proof the engine limited the game? Where?

No circumstantial proof is not it. Things in the games only prove what is in the games, not that the engine did that? Who here has a list of the full technical specs that tell us what the RE4 engine can and can't do, that proves Capcom made the wrong choice of engine?

In the case of that game, Sven stated it cost about as much as an original game at the bottom of that page. So even though it's not an actual port, it still cost a lot.

I just remembered that Too Human is proof a custom engine only automatically means more money, not better graphics, and especially not better sales.

Sure there were other factors involved, but that also proves that notion bunk, as the notion assumes that each naturally leads to the other, when it doesn't.

Plus I really doubt that the RE4 engine hurt the game's graphics, given what it did for the graphics in RE4, and the fact that this engine is not the same engine used on the GC, but a modified one made for RE4 Wii Edition.