HappySqurriel said: washimul said: the Aurana demo runs at 1 fps ......u are comparing that to CELL...............what a shame. did you read the links i provided???? No:- what a shame????pentium 3 running a complex demo but taking years for that., atleast know something before posting. This is what Barry said regarding raytacing Comment by Barry Minor — March 8, 2007 @ 11:01 am To put this render job in perspective I just ran one frame of this scene through 3dsMax’s default ray-tracer an it took my Centrino Duo (dual core x86) machine one hour eight minutes to render what Cell and the iRT renders in less than one half of a second. http://gametomorrow.com/blog/index.php/2007/03/07/cell-power-at-gdc-2007/To put this render job in perspective I just ran one frame of this scene through 3dsMax’s default ray-tracer an it took my Centrino Duo (dual core x86) machine one hour eight minutes to render what Cell and the iRT renders in less than one half of a second. do u get an idea of how powerful the CELL is : 1 hour 8 minutes on DUAL CORE CENTRINO translates to just half a second on CELL Well, the demo runs at 12fps on my system and has been reported to run at over 60fps on an Intel Core 2 Extreme ... Now, since you don't bother reading and understanding your links here is an important quote: Using IBM’s scalable iRT rendering technology, the PS3 is able to decompose each frame into manageable work regions and dynamically distribute them to blades or other PS3s for rendering. Which means that the cell on the PS3 was only doing scene-graph management off loading the majority of the work to blade servers ... Now, surpringly enough they didn't mention the type or quantity of blade servers they were using ... Being that this was IBM they have access to a lot of high quality servers so I wouldn't be surprised to find out that it was 12-24 blade servers each with 1 or 2 Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors running at 2.33 GHz ... This would mean that 12 - 48 Quad core intel processors can outperform a dual core processor what a shocker!

Lingyis said: washimul said: SENTINEL have you been atleast reading the links i provided. Those are from MC, UC, IBM and MIT..............i havent invented anything by my own. look at all the links i provided before making comments UPDATE :- CELL now does 1080p raytracing with IRT This week at Game Developers Conference IBM will show a Linux based PS3 real-time rendering a complex (3 million triangle) urban landscape, at 1080p resolution, using only software rendering techniques (iRT). Credible sources should be a given--the point is you need a proper presentation. In fact, saying something like that reduces your credibility, since you need to relegate your convincing to the sources. We all know the PS3 is powerful, so why won't I just google if it's a bunch of links that I want.

linkthe2nd said: You have to stop posting the same thing over and over. How many times have I heard "It took the INTEL CENTRINO an hour and eight minutes to do this while it was done in half a second on the CELL." Stop capitalizing the names. It's annoying. And provide ANSWERS to what people ask you and stuff instead of repeating the same crap again.

HappySqurriel said: linkthe2nd said: You have to stop posting the same thing over and over. How many times have I heard "It took the INTEL CENTRINO an hour and eight minutes to do this while it was done in half a second on the CELL." Stop capitalizing the names. It's annoying. And provide ANSWERS to what people ask you and stuff instead of repeating the same crap again. Because he can't provide answers ... I wish the mods would ban him for good ...

HappySqurriel said: linkthe2nd said: You have to stop posting the same thing over and over. How many times have I heard "It took the INTEL CENTRINO an hour and eight minutes to do this while it was done in half a second on the CELL." Stop capitalizing the names. It's annoying. And provide ANSWERS to what people ask you and stuff instead of repeating the same crap again. Because he can't provide answers ... I wish the mods would ban him for good ...

mrstickball said: HappySqurriel said: linkthe2nd said: You have to stop posting the same thing over and over. How many times have I heard "It took the INTEL CENTRINO an hour and eight minutes to do this while it was done in half a second on the CELL." Stop capitalizing the names. It's annoying. And provide ANSWERS to what people ask you and stuff instead of repeating the same crap again. Because he can't provide answers ... I wish the mods would ban him for good ... I like Washimul here. He's alot of fun to read his "posts". Every forum has to have its 'tard, and he's our 'tard. I just like his crazy & stupid predictions that always fail in the face of reality. Does he even try the prediction league to prove he knows better than anyone else? lol.

Sintinel said: It's like you want your threads to be locked. I'm not gonna lock this(yet), because I agree with what Ben said: Even though the presentation is absolutely horrid, you do have some content. Your title needs some serious work, however. And I'm not kidding. That title is awful. Please remember that so future threads don't get locked. And I'm watching this thread pretty closely. Drugs are bad, mkay? washimul said: SENTINEL have you been atleast reading the links i provided. Those are from MC, UC, IBM and MIT..............i havent invented anything by my own. look at all the links i provided before making comments UPDATE :- CELL now does 1080p raytracing with IRT This week at Game Developers Conference IBM will show a Linux based PS3 real-time rendering a complex (3 million triangle) urban landscape, at 1080p resolution, using only software rendering techniques (iRT).