By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Is abortion a crime against humanity?

There is no strict and definitive cut-off, it varies from state to state both in Australia (my experience) and America (as far as i understand)

Generally in most western countries the standards for performing an abortion after 20 weeks are stricter, and the fact that only about 1-2% of abortions are done at above twenty weeks indicates a general unwillingness, either on the part of mothers, doctors or both to perform abortions after this point.



Around the Network
WessleWoggle said:
Nirvana_Nut85 proclaimed:
 

 

 

 

It is life, it is a living bieng, that's not the argument, the argument is at what stage does it have rights if any. Whereas I believe it has rights at the moment of conception

Do you believe a cow or a dog has rights at the moment of conception?

At the moment of conception, there's little difference between a human, dog, or cow.

 

From a christian aspect yes, human life is more precious regardless wether it be from the moment of conception or not. Don't get me wrong I love animals, but I don't consider them to be on the same level as a human being.

 



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

Nirvana_Nut85 said:
WessleWoggle said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
WessleWoggle said:
 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I know how pregnancy is, I have 2 beautiful daughters (yah 23 is young but yah...) I was with my girlfriend through the whole thing and I saw how hard it is, yet at the same time ,although woman have to go throught that during a pregnancy, I don't believe that that should give the justification to end a human life. To be fully honest when it's your baby you see being born (as grosse as the procedures on t.v look) it'sa beautiful; thing that was worth the whole 9 months of pains,ect (from her perspective).

Human life is precious, it's just that we take it for granted. also how do we know that they baby doesn't have a concept of what life is? Brain waives start (and correct me if I'm wrong) around 6 weeks (though limited) into the pregnancy. Now I look at it from a spiritual aspect which alot of people don't, being a huge reason why I think that life is precious. I believe we all have souls.

 

 

 

 

 

It's true we don't know when or if a baby develops a concept of life, but you could argue it has a primal concept of life, on the level of any other non-human fetus.

But I think perception of life and death on the same conceptual level as a human, takes place outside the womb, in the human world, with a concious introspective level of thought. Death is only horrible if you think "I'm dying", do you think fetuses think that or just feel pain and panic?

Materialistically speaking there's no intristic value, nothing precious about life, we're just a reaction. Souls are unproven.

If you believe in souls, can't they find another body? What do you believe about souls?

 

I'll answer the soul question first. I don't believe that you are necessarily a soul floating around looking for a body, but more along the lines of the judeo-christian ideology. Creation in conception. Obviously this opinion is more based on faith, because we cannot prove or disprove but only theorize.

I do believe there is some concept of the fetus knowing that they are dying which is why earliest recorded at 12 weeks the baby starts to panic and avoid being aborted. Wether that happens even earlier is unknown as I'm not sure if there is any ultrasound video,ect of this being done.

 

Why do you think they know they're dying? They're just escaping pain.

 



some animals eat their young. We are but animals governed by rules



Nirvana_Nut85 said:

 

From what I know the baby will try and move away from the abortion tools at 12 weeks. I am researching further to see if there is evidence of this at earlier stages.

Now as for the mother issue. As terrible as it might sound, if a woman is raped, well, I think that she should go through with the pregnancy. That just my opinion and I know people will think that's terrible but yah. I mean I understand that she did not want ot become pregnant , but at the same time that baby didn't ask to be created either.

See now I understand how you called me out for the mother issue "which as I think about it more I agree that in those circumstances they should let nature take it's course" but I ask you the same question, are you not bieng hypocritical yourself? To say that your pro choice, but yet at certain stages in the baby's development you become pro life? So when does it go f4rom being a mother's choice to a baby's right to life?

I don't think you understand my stance and many others as being pro-choice. We have our own moral cutoffs where we do feel the baby is given rights to live. That is what makes us pro-choice. We don't have to be pro-choice for 9 months of pregnancy to be in the club. You however are being hypocritical by saying you are pro-life and then making compromises that do not benefit the unborn. Frankly, you and most people like you are not pro-life at all. You're merely pro-choicers that just have a different set of cutoffs than others do. As hsrob said earlier, most of you are more like a conservative bunch of pro-choicers.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Around the Network
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:

 

If the fetus lacks the ability to make choices due to lack of brain functions then why when an abortion is bieng performed the fetus will literally try to move away from the tools and avoid bieng killed. Why does it's heart rate increse, while this is happening. It must have to have some sense of self preservation or enough brain function to try avoid death. Therefore should that unborn baby not have a legal right to be able the chance to be given life?

I believe in methods of preventing unwanted pregnancies. Mind you,if that person is to become pregnant and does not want the baby, there are many people who want to adopt, and that is the better solution. If you really think about it, there's no reason why a pregnancy should not be carried out when there are more than enough options for the mother after the child is born.

See in a scenario like that, it becomes a hard choice to make. The scenario is rare, but it still happens. If it was me having the baby (if I was a woman) and I had someone able to take care of the baby then I wouldn't think twice about giving up my life for it.But thats me not everyone. In a scenario where it will 100% cause death to the mother then I would let her make that choice. That is the only justification in which a mother "should" be able to terminate a pregnancy.

Fuck, it's not being lazy by putting pictures. I never assumed you or Mafoo would change thier opinion over it. There are people as I have stated (mostly younger) who are prochoice and have know idea what the procedure is or how it looks, or what is done to the baby. That is why I posted them, for the uninformed. In all honesty the irresponsible bitch should not have the right to put her own selfish needs before the life of an unborn baby. An unborn baby is still a human being. It is still alive and living. We do not and should not have the right to be able to end that life.

Now, just so it doesn't sound like were just blaming the mother's who abort thier unborn babies. I think the piece of shit guy's who put pressure on thier girlfriends to have an aboprtion if they get pregnant should have a bat taken to thier heads.

At what stage in a pregnancy can the fetus actually try to preserve it's life by moving away from abortion tools? I may be pro-choice, but I am not inhumane. If there is concrete proof that your scenario can happen at 20 weeks or prior, I will move my scale down to the appropriate time.

In my scenario I gave you, you decided to say the woman could make the choice. That right there is being pro-choice. That is allowing the mother to make the decision regarding the child's life. A pro-life stance would be let nature take it's course because no one can impede on the right's of the unborn child. By saying the mother can make the decisions of the unborn regarding it's life, you too have taken a stance of pro-choice. Now if you believe a woman can make that choice to spare her own life, then why not for other reasons? You've already made it abundantly clear by giving the woman the choice that her decision making is more precious than the fetus' is.

That right there is the copout I hate hearing from pro-lifers. It's the considerations and compromises made based on certain scenarios. "Oh, look. She was raped. Let's allow that woman to have an abortion." Why? That woman's life is not in danger. The fetus is not given a choice. Maybe the fetus doesn't mind growing up knowing it's the product of a rape incident. However the fetus is not given a choice in the matter, and the mother is allowed to terminate a pregnancy to save her mental well being. Most pro-choicers seem fine with that scenario. However, mental health is a grey area, and a woman merely going through with a traditional pregnancy can suffer from it too because of her going through with it. Why can't they get abortions? It's these contradictory areas that I find to be bullshit in the arguments with pro-lifers. It should be all or none. Either defend the rights of the unborn or don't, but making compromises such as these dilutes your stance.

 

 

From what I know the baby will try and move away from the abortion tools at 12 weeks. I am researching further to see if there is evidence of this at earlier stages.

Now as for the mother issue. As terrible as it might sound, if a woman is raped, well, I think that she should go through with the pregnancy. That just my opinion and I know people will think that's terrible but yah. I mean I understand that she did not want ot become pregnant , but at the same time that baby didn't ask to be created either.

See now I understand how you called me out for the mother issue "which as I think about it more I agree that in those circumstances they should let nature take it's course" but I ask you the same question, are you not bieng hypocritical yourself? To say that your pro choice, but yet at certain stages in the baby's development you become pro life? So when does it go f4rom being a mother's choice to a baby's right to life?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wow, just wow. I hope you never tell your future partner in wife this, and even more so that the bad fortune of this happening to her never happens. You can say this now, but if it ever happened to you your opinion would greatly change. Liberalism really seems to push the boundries when it comes to ridiculous reasonings.

 

You just made me sick, opinion or not. This is an example of when an opinion can be wrong.



The Halo francise is the most overrated bland game to ever hit the console market. It provides a bad name to all FPS that even showed effort at creating an original entertaining plot.

I probably have more ps3 games than you :/ 

WessleWoggle said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
WessleWoggle said:

It's true we don't know when or if a baby develops a concept of life, but you could argue it has a primal concept of life, on the level of any other non-human fetus.

But I think perception of life and death on the same conceptual level as a human, takes place outside the womb, in the human world, with a concious introspective level of thought. Death is only horrible if you think "I'm dying", do you think fetuses think that or just feel pain and panic?

Materialistically speaking there's no intristic value, nothing precious about life, we're just a reaction. Souls are unproven.

If you believe in souls, can't they find another body? What do you believe about souls?

 

I'll answer the soul question first. I don't believe that you are necessarily a soul floating around looking for a body, but more along the lines of the judeo-christian ideology. Creation in conception. Obviously this opinion is more based on faith, because we cannot prove or disprove but only theorize.

I do believe there is some concept of the fetus knowing that they are dying which is why earliest recorded at 12 weeks the baby starts to panic and avoid being aborted. Wether that happens even earlier is unknown as I'm not sure if there is any ultrasound video,ect of this being done.

 

Why do you think they know they're dying? They're just escaping pain.

 

Most likely (although not certainly) a fetus cannot feel pain until after 26 weeks. Parts of the brain that are required to interpret pain have not developed until that point.

 



Rath said:
WessleWoggle said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
WessleWoggle said:
 

It's true we don't know when or if a baby develops a concept of life, but you could argue it has a primal concept of life, on the level of any other non-human fetus.

But I think perception of life and death on the same conceptual level as a human, takes place outside the womb, in the human world, with a concious introspective level of thought. Death is only horrible if you think "I'm dying", do you think fetuses think that or just feel pain and panic?

Materialistically speaking there's no intristic value, nothing precious about life, we're just a reaction. Souls are unproven.

If you believe in souls, can't they find another body? What do you believe about souls?

 

I'll answer the soul question first. I don't believe that you are necessarily a soul floating around looking for a body, but more along the lines of the judeo-christian ideology. Creation in conception. Obviously this opinion is more based on faith, because we cannot prove or disprove but only theorize.

I do believe there is some concept of the fetus knowing that they are dying which is why earliest recorded at 12 weeks the baby starts to panic and avoid being aborted. Wether that happens even earlier is unknown as I'm not sure if there is any ultrasound video,ect of this being done.

 

Why do you think they know they're dying? They're just escaping pain.

 

Most likely (although not certainly) a fetus cannot feel pain until after 26 weeks. Parts of the brain that are required to interpret pain have not developed until that point.

 

Okay, then it's panic minus the pain.

Even without pain there's still awareness that something fucked up is happening.

 



See sig.



CaseyDDR said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
 

 

If the fetus lacks the ability to make choices due to lack of brain functions then why when an abortion is bieng performed the fetus will literally try to move away from the tools and avoid bieng killed. Why does it's heart rate increse, while this is happening. It must have to have some sense of self preservation or enough brain function to try avoid death. Therefore should that unborn baby not have a legal right to be able the chance to be given life?

I believe in methods of preventing unwanted pregnancies. Mind you,if that person is to become pregnant and does not want the baby, there are many people who want to adopt, and that is the better solution. If you really think about it, there's no reason why a pregnancy should not be carried out when there are more than enough options for the mother after the child is born.

See in a scenario like that, it becomes a hard choice to make. The scenario is rare, but it still happens. If it was me having the baby (if I was a woman) and I had someone able to take care of the baby then I wouldn't think twice about giving up my life for it.But thats me not everyone. In a scenario where it will 100% cause death to the mother then I would let her make that choice. That is the only justification in which a mother "should" be able to terminate a pregnancy.

Fuck, it's not being lazy by putting pictures. I never assumed you or Mafoo would change thier opinion over it. There are people as I have stated (mostly younger) who are prochoice and have know idea what the procedure is or how it looks, or what is done to the baby. That is why I posted them, for the uninformed. In all honesty the irresponsible bitch should not have the right to put her own selfish needs before the life of an unborn baby. An unborn baby is still a human being. It is still alive and living. We do not and should not have the right to be able to end that life.

Now, just so it doesn't sound like were just blaming the mother's who abort thier unborn babies. I think the piece of shit guy's who put pressure on thier girlfriends to have an aboprtion if they get pregnant should have a bat taken to thier heads.

At what stage in a pregnancy can the fetus actually try to preserve it's life by moving away from abortion tools? I may be pro-choice, but I am not inhumane. If there is concrete proof that your scenario can happen at 20 weeks or prior, I will move my scale down to the appropriate time.

In my scenario I gave you, you decided to say the woman could make the choice. That right there is being pro-choice. That is allowing the mother to make the decision regarding the child's life. A pro-life stance would be let nature take it's course because no one can impede on the right's of the unborn child. By saying the mother can make the decisions of the unborn regarding it's life, you too have taken a stance of pro-choice. Now if you believe a woman can make that choice to spare her own life, then why not for other reasons? You've already made it abundantly clear by giving the woman the choice that her decision making is more precious than the fetus' is.

That right there is the copout I hate hearing from pro-lifers. It's the considerations and compromises made based on certain scenarios. "Oh, look. She was raped. Let's allow that woman to have an abortion." Why? That woman's life is not in danger. The fetus is not given a choice. Maybe the fetus doesn't mind growing up knowing it's the product of a rape incident. However the fetus is not given a choice in the matter, and the mother is allowed to terminate a pregnancy to save her mental well being. Most pro-choicers seem fine with that scenario. However, mental health is a grey area, and a woman merely going through with a traditional pregnancy can suffer from it too because of her going through with it. Why can't they get abortions? It's these contradictory areas that I find to be bullshit in the arguments with pro-lifers. It should be all or none. Either defend the rights of the unborn or don't, but making compromises such as these dilutes your stance.

 

 

From what I know the baby will try and move away from the abortion tools at 12 weeks. I am researching further to see if there is evidence of this at earlier stages.

Now as for the mother issue. As terrible as it might sound, if a woman is raped, well, I think that she should go through with the pregnancy. That just my opinion and I know people will think that's terrible but yah. I mean I understand that she did not want ot become pregnant , but at the same time that baby didn't ask to be created either.

See now I understand how you called me out for the mother issue "which as I think about it more I agree that in those circumstances they should let nature take it's course" but I ask you the same question, are you not bieng hypocritical yourself? To say that your pro choice, but yet at certain stages in the baby's development you become pro life? So when does it go f4rom being a mother's choice to a baby's right to life?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wow, just wow. I hope you never tell your future partner in wife this, and even more so that the bad fortune of this happening to her never happens. You can say this now, but if it ever happened to you your opinion would greatly change. Liberalism really seems to push the boundries when it comes to ridiculous reasonings.

 

You just made me sick, opinion or not. This is an example of when an opinion can be wrong.

How is my opinion wrong and sick? Do I think that a woman who has been taken advantage of and been impregnated should keep the baby, yes because in my mind the baby is a living human being, now, at the same time would I condemn her for aborting that child...no, due to the circumstances, but at the same time I wouldn't agree.

 



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"