| Nirvana_Nut85 said:
From what I know the baby will try and move away from the abortion tools at 12 weeks. I am researching further to see if there is evidence of this at earlier stages. Now as for the mother issue. As terrible as it might sound, if a woman is raped, well, I think that she should go through with the pregnancy. That just my opinion and I know people will think that's terrible but yah. I mean I understand that she did not want ot become pregnant , but at the same time that baby didn't ask to be created either. See now I understand how you called me out for the mother issue "which as I think about it more I agree that in those circumstances they should let nature take it's course" but I ask you the same question, are you not bieng hypocritical yourself? To say that your pro choice, but yet at certain stages in the baby's development you become pro life? So when does it go f4rom being a mother's choice to a baby's right to life? |
I don't think you understand my stance and many others as being pro-choice. We have our own moral cutoffs where we do feel the baby is given rights to live. That is what makes us pro-choice. We don't have to be pro-choice for 9 months of pregnancy to be in the club. You however are being hypocritical by saying you are pro-life and then making compromises that do not benefit the unborn. Frankly, you and most people like you are not pro-life at all. You're merely pro-choicers that just have a different set of cutoffs than others do. As hsrob said earlier, most of you are more like a conservative bunch of pro-choicers.
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
