this is very old, i remember when this come out a long time ago, people were making fun at his dev experience, since guitar hero has the best graphics on the industry

Looks like your opinions wrong as well then, seeing as how you can't prove that any game on the PS3 has graphics better than the 360 (Give me numbers or give me silence)

Also, since when were graphics the definition of power? what's the point of amazing graphics if the CPU isn't able to produce decent AI (Note: Not accusing any PS3 or 360 game of this in particular, just stating how ridiculous that graphics is the benchmark of power).

Finally, does anyone really care about power given that the Wii is killing both of them in sales/profit?

NOTE: I'm not trying to rag on the PS3 here, personally, I think it's more powerful than the 360. But that's just it, I THINK that it is and that's all any one has in this forum, their own thoughts and opinions. Until we get a break down of FPS, polygons count or whatever stat that demonstrates graphical prowess or power, we can't say with certainty that one has better graphics than the other or is more powerful than the other in real world application. Also, I chuckle at the thought that graphics = power. Seriously, way to set a high benchmark for gaming companies next generation by letting them know that you don't care about advances in AI or gameplay, you just care about how big their GPU is. Nice.

you tool!!! rockband has the best graphics for any rythm based games.  Their graphics are great (not amazing but still leagues bettter than guitar hero or anything like that)

stop with the pretencious sony PR BS and retarded  food comparisons..do you work for sony?  And we are talking about closed consoles here. As a consumer all we need to know is if the game is good.

PC gaming is not console gaming so what if it's more or less powerful nothing we can damn well do about it. So sit down shut up shell out your money and have fun playing.

Ever since the PS1/N64/Saturn era when 3D was advertised as the main focused it has been infused in our heads and since pushed as if it really matters to us when it doesn't and that sorta thinking has only gotten worse.  

I still play games on my NES Game gear Dreamcast and all my older consoles as well as new ones and still enjoy the games just as much. Not saying visuals don't matter as they do influence your gameplay experience but it was never how much power and number of poly's or sprites was used it was how they used what they had.....more more more does not really make things better.

It rarely does but has this massive misconception it does.

I have to agree with what he says,  GPU matters way over CPU as the GPU will most always be the limiting factor, any one that builds gamming PCS knows this, but the comment about PS3 exclusives sucking wasn't needed

In defense about how xbox 360 has to come out with a better looking game, who cares.  Not every dev wants to spend 5 years optimizing the crap out of a game to get it as good as possible

Coming from the biggest Xbox advocate ever spawned, this doesn't hurt at all

I estimate the PS3 being 20% faster than the X360. It's not much to argue about.

Games on PS3 n X360 look rufly equal, and 20% is neglibile in the long run, since a console generation is 16 times the computing power of the former generation.
(double processing power each 18 months, in 6 years it becomes 1 x2x2x2x2= 16 times)

Until I actually see any plausible proof that the PS3 is more powerful then the 360 in any catogory including graphics, I will keep saying they are equal.

in b4 "hurrr xbox cant doz teh killzonezzzzz"

Killzone 2 is the best console graphics we've seen to date. For a very long time, Gears of War 1 held the crown. Does that mean for that entire time from when Gears was released to KZ the 360 was more powerful then the PS3?

MadB, er... I mean MikeB is a funnny character.

As you've probably noticed by now he brings up thee amiga at the drop of a hat. He is something of an afficianado for it. Anyways he used to always pull up quotes from various sources that likened the Cell to the Amiga. I mean constantly. As far as I and a couple other people can tell, this is the reason why he bought a PS3 since he wasn't a console gamer before. Combine this with the fact that Microsoft played a not insignificant role in teh death of Amiga and I think you can get a grasp as to where this guy is comming from, as crazy as it sounds.

Oh, and he will always ignore any real valid point you make. See my posts above. Plus ignoring things when hes wrong, typing IMO, being 'polite' through passive-agres..... fuck it.

Living life vicariously through a piece a silicon and plastic is a sad, sad exsistence.

Points of views can go both ways; I felt that when gears of war 1 came out that it was only on equal footing with the ps3 version of unreal tournament 3.  So when uncharted dropped  I was blown away by it and knew that it was much better looking than gears 1 (from a technical stand point and because it had more going on in the environment and better draw distance). Then when metal gear solid 4 came out I was again still not seeing anything beating either of these two games on the 360.  I obviously was shocked to see the significant leap in graphic fidelity between gears 1 to 2, so I immediately thought maybe there was more to the 360 than I first thought.  But all that came to a end and stopped me from buying the 360 when I saw and played killzone 2, so like your opinion is valued....so should someone else with a different opinion.