By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Why MAG is ONLY PS3. Not possible X360 or PC:

kibebr said:

Well, there´s a simple answer: X360 has been hacked ahd there´s many ways of cheating, and on PC this os a lot more obvious.

This game needs to distribute processing power and sync less information as possible to handle more than 200 users on the same batle.. so PS3 is OK for that, because it isn´t hackeable till now and there´s plenty GPU available ofr dong this on each PS3 as Peer processing.

So, this is it. End of discussion.

As a Xbot or PCbot you will say: Ohh ohhh but I play COD4 (on my X360 or PC) and there´s no cheating, ohh yeah, it´s true, but all is handled, processed and directed by the server, not MAG case. So, keep coll and accept this.

BYE

The PS3 isn't hackable?  Then how exactly do people set it up in clusters, and as super computers, and as grilling machines, and turn it into a laptop without hacking?

Also, "hacking" has nothing to do with what you are talking about as far as "ways of cheating".  What happens often times on the 360 is it is being wired through a PC and the PC is running the cheating programs, not the 360 itself.  The same can be done with a PS3.  If you really haven't seen cheating on any PS3 games, you didn't play online multiplayer enough.



Around the Network

Yeah okay, the 360's been hacked and people cheat online.

The PS3 must not have glitch bitches and FragFX users then.... oh wait.

Clearly you don't get that glitch bitching has nothing to do with hardware and it's the programming of the game that does it, that's why losers can score goals from the half way line in Fifa and why people can hide underneath or over the map in CoD.

The fact that the PS3 has FragFX completely blows out any notion of the PS3 having a fairer online experience then the 360.

I (as a PS3 owner) am not going to buy M.A.G. Seemed like a waste of development money (they have socom and warhawk, throwing in 256 players won't make it a better experience) and if it spawns stupid comments like OP's, clearly it's no good.



nightsurge said:
kibebr said:

Well, there´s a simple answer: X360 has been hacked ahd there´s many ways of cheating, and on PC this os a lot more obvious.

This game needs to distribute processing power and sync less information as possible to handle more than 200 users on the same batle.. so PS3 is OK for that, because it isn´t hackeable till now and there´s plenty GPU available ofr dong this on each PS3 as Peer processing.

So, this is it. End of discussion.

As a Xbot or PCbot you will say: Ohh ohhh but I play COD4 (on my X360 or PC) and there´s no cheating, ohh yeah, it´s true, but all is handled, processed and directed by the server, not MAG case. So, keep coll and accept this.

BYE

The PS3 isn't hackable?  Then how exactly do people set it up in clusters, and as super computers, and as grilling machines, and turn it into a laptop without hacking?

Also, "hacking" has nothing to do with what you are talking about as far as "ways of cheating".  What happens often times on the 360 is it is being wired through a PC and the PC is running the cheating programs, not the 360 itself.  The same can be done with a PS3.  If you really haven't seen cheating on any PS3 games, you didn't play online multiplayer enough.

 

you really didnt believe that ... didnt you ? O_o

 

btw what you said is not hacking , Cluster computing , turning the Ps3 into a laptop is not really hacking since sony made it for you to use it that way (if you want) and linux made a special OS for the ps3 called yellow dog. hacking is like getting PSN games for free or getting online servers to close and kick everyone thats one way at looking at it.



This statement is half true, half false.

We have no idea how the PSN will be able to handle 256 players on in the same game at one time.

MAG may not be possible on X360 due to X360 not having dedicated servers.

But not possible on PC? That is not true. PC has much better online servers that could easily handle games similar to MAG.



Soriku said:

Why would you believe Sony about what the 360 can and can't do? Sony don't make games for it, and I doubt they'd waste their time testing a game on the 360 just so they can do some PR.

 

Exaclty...I posted a similar post in the thread about a former bungie dev saying KZ2 is possible on 360...I said "why would you belive a guy who have never even developed a single ps3 game and not GG(the one who made KZ2)".



Around the Network
dahuman said:
Stop comparing i7 to Cell, apples and oranges, you can't compare them, stop posting stupid crap like that if you don't know how those processors work.

I've already brought this up before as well, PLANETSIDE! 133 players per faction on a planet making 399 total per battle going on for as long as an entire day or much longer( not to mention multiple planets,) that's bigger than MAG or Hux per battle and it's been done for years by none other than Sony back in 2003. Wake up and realize that whatever you get on a console that's originally a western genre, it's already been done on the PC.

Too bad that everyone is just skipping your post. About processors, i7 have more wits(lots of it) than strenght compared to cell, which is made quite much purely for raw power.(^^, I know.. Still its not that far from truth.)

Well, planetside is quite nice, but WW II online is even more massive. It could handle about 10 000 players early 2001.

OVER 9000! (Maybe this will draw attension of those weak minded poor souls.)

Three days prior to release, the colocation network facility had a bad fiber optic cable. This failure reduced the player capacity of the server cluster, from 10,000 players down to only 1200 players. As a temporary workaround, Playnet set up multiple copies of the game-world on different servers, distributing the network load, but at some cost in game play. This solution lasted for several months while the developers resolved the server-side issues, after which all servers were merged into a single game-world.

There has been lots of upgrades and theres incredible amount of vehicles and weapons. No other fps game has been so massive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_Online

And of course playing area is something that you can only dream of on consoles.

WWIIOL online uses a ½ scale map of Western Europe with 30,000 km² of accurate terrain (800 m resolution satellite data). It is commonly recognized as the first MMOFPS.

And last thing is damage model, which is quite nicely done also.

The damage model in WWIIOL is more complex than surface appearance indicates. Several critical components within each vehicle are modeled, and often interact. For example, if a radiator is punctured, it may boil off its coolant, causing the engine block (an independent critical component) to seize. Damaged components also provide feedback into the flight or ground simulation model; for aircraft, damage to flight surfaces will result in increased drag and reduced performance of the vehicle. Armor is placed in all vehicles to protect these components, with historically accurate detail on armor angle and thickness

The ballistic model is also detailed, taking into account drag coefficient properties, muzzle velocity, and mass of each individual type of ammunition. For instance, High Explosive (HE) rounds typically travel a shorter distance than Armour Piercing (AP) shells, when fired from the same cannon, due to higher drag coefficient and lower mass

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_Online



Rei said:
And once PS3 is hacked?

 

MAG is impossible.



vthokiesrmoo said:
Soleron said:

What?

Look, there are PC processors much faster than the Cell. With Core i7 you can have more threads than the Cell too (has 8; Cell has 7).

But i don't think you're trying to make a serious point here.

 

The cheapest Core i7 is 300 dollars. You can't beat what you get with a PS3 for the price.

yeah but it is Definatly possible on PC. PC can do ANYTHING that either of these consoles do and everyone needs to stop believing this bull shit. Honestly most likely the Xbox 360 can do it. But regardless not being hackable is not a valid excuse at all because think about it if i install linux on my ps3 it basically is hacked so i call BS on that argument and also M$ bans hacked/modded consoles from live so that dosnt work either.

 



Long Live SHIO!

PS3 fanboys really need to hype their games. Probably because of a lack of quality.

(You see what you made me do? This is just a stupid response to a stupid OP)



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

1337 Gamer said:
vthokiesrmoo said:
Soleron said:

What?

Look, there are PC processors much faster than the Cell. With Core i7 you can have more threads than the Cell too (has 8; Cell has 7).

But i don't think you're trying to make a serious point here.

 

The cheapest Core i7 is 300 dollars. You can't beat what you get with a PS3 for the price.

yeah but it is Definatly possible on PC. PC can do ANYTHING that either of these consoles do and everyone needs to stop believing this bull shit. Honestly most likely the Xbox 360 can do it. But regardless not being hackable is not a valid excuse at all because think about it if i install linux on my ps3 it basically is hacked so i call BS on that argument and also M$ bans hacked/modded consoles from live so that dosnt work either.

 

SONY allows us to install other OSes. If you go in the settings there is an option; 'Install Other OS'

 



Initiating social expirement #928719281