By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo criticised by Greenpeace

Godot said:
Wow, I didn't think most people here would not care about Nintendo's attitude. Greenpeace is stupid on many ways but that list isn't actually bad. Electronics are causing a lot of pollution and it's no wonder Samsung and Nokia are at the top while Nintendo is last. Don't you think Nintendo doesn't send the information because they don't have an environmental program at all?

They do actually put a small amount if information on their website about some things they don't use, some of them I believe are part of Greenpeaces survey too, but rather than try to gather the information Greenpeace wanted Nintendo to just give it to them.

There is also the fact that Nintendo outsources for all their components, quite a lot of different companies make parts for the Wii and DS... often 2or 3 companies are making exactly the same parts.... A lot more difficult than for Sony who do the majority of stuff in-house, so they know what goes into their components. The PS2 early production problems were in part due to a lack of a specific (and I believe environmentally dangerous) component that I think may have been part of the Emotion Engine (someone may have to correct me if I get any of this wrong).... it was also something to do with Africa but I have clearly forgotten the details.

 



Around the Network
Acevil said:
Always entertaining when peta or greenpeace talks.

Same here. That's why I posted this, just for the laughts.



 

I am all for the environment but Greenpeace can kiss my ass with their terrible "studies" / "reports".



NEXT.........................

Mario Kart anyone ?



Does anyone care what Greenpeace says, besides Greenpeace?



Around the Network

We've known for years now that Greenpeace is so desperate for attention that they'll stoop to Nintendo-trolling. What makes this any different?



Complexity is not depth. Machismo is not maturity. Obsession is not dedication. Tedium is not challenge. Support gaming: support the Wii.

Be the ultimate ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! Poisson Village welcomes new players.

What do I hate about modern gaming? I hate tedium replacing challenge, complexity replacing depth, and domination replacing entertainment. I hate the outsourcing of mechanics to physics textbooks, art direction to photocopiers, and story to cheap Hollywood screenwriters. I hate the confusion of obsession with dedication, style with substance, new with gimmicky, old with obsolete, new with evolutionary, and old with time-tested.
There is much to hate about modern gaming. That is why I support the Wii.

Greenpeace is to enviormentalists what clinic bombers are to the Pro-Life movement.



If they actually cared about the environment, they would properly evaluate the Wii and it's packaging and write a report to Nintendo on how they could improve it. Nintendo could completely ignore it but at least it would show some professionalism on Greenpeace's part.



you know if Greenpeace wouldn't try to kill inuit tribes trying to kill the one whale a year that they do, I might actually care what they say:

http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/41/408.html



spdk1 said:
you know if Greenpeace wouldn't try to kill inuit tribes trying to kill the one whale a year that they do, I might actually care what they say:

http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/41/408.html

While horrible... I still think it's worse that they intentionally ram boats.

I mean... Greenpeace is basically people who grew up thinking poison Ivy had a point.